Democracy in America at work: the history of labor’s vote in corporate governance

E. McGaughey
{"title":"Democracy in America at work: the history of labor’s vote in corporate governance","authors":"E. McGaughey","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/sb3zp","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can there be democracy in America at work? The historical division between democracy in politics and hierarchy in the economy is under strain. Hierarchical interests in the economy are shifting their model of power into politics, and yet a commitment to revive the law is resurgent. Central examples are the proposed Accountable Capitalism Act, Reward Work Act, Workplace Democracy Acts, and Employees’ Pension Security Acts. They would create a right for employees to elect 40% of directors on $1 billion company boards, a right for employees to elect one-third of directors on other listed company boards, and require one-half employee representation on single-employer pension plans. All challenge long held myths: that labor’s involvement in corporate governance is foreign to American tradition, that when codified in law labor voice is economically inefficient, that the legitimate way to have voice in the economy is by buying stocks, or that labor voice faces insurmountable legal obstacles. This article shows these myths are mistaken by exploring the history and evidence from 1861. The United States has one of the world’s strongest traditions of democracy at work. Economic democracy has not been more widespread primarily because it was suppressed by law. Americans favor voice at work, while asset managers who monopolize shareholder votes with ‘other people’s money’ enjoy no legitimacy at all. The article concludes that, even without federal government, and by recreating themselves as laboratories of democracy and enterprise, states can adapt the current proposals and rebuild a living law. (2019) 42 Seattle University Law Review 697.","PeriodicalId":82684,"journal":{"name":"Seattle University law review","volume":"42 1","pages":"697-753"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seattle University law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/sb3zp","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Can there be democracy in America at work? The historical division between democracy in politics and hierarchy in the economy is under strain. Hierarchical interests in the economy are shifting their model of power into politics, and yet a commitment to revive the law is resurgent. Central examples are the proposed Accountable Capitalism Act, Reward Work Act, Workplace Democracy Acts, and Employees’ Pension Security Acts. They would create a right for employees to elect 40% of directors on $1 billion company boards, a right for employees to elect one-third of directors on other listed company boards, and require one-half employee representation on single-employer pension plans. All challenge long held myths: that labor’s involvement in corporate governance is foreign to American tradition, that when codified in law labor voice is economically inefficient, that the legitimate way to have voice in the economy is by buying stocks, or that labor voice faces insurmountable legal obstacles. This article shows these myths are mistaken by exploring the history and evidence from 1861. The United States has one of the world’s strongest traditions of democracy at work. Economic democracy has not been more widespread primarily because it was suppressed by law. Americans favor voice at work, while asset managers who monopolize shareholder votes with ‘other people’s money’ enjoy no legitimacy at all. The article concludes that, even without federal government, and by recreating themselves as laboratories of democracy and enterprise, states can adapt the current proposals and rebuild a living law. (2019) 42 Seattle University Law Review 697.
工作中的美国民主:劳工在公司治理中投票的历史
美国能有民主在起作用吗?政治上的民主和经济上的等级制度之间的历史分歧正在紧张之中。经济中的等级利益正在将其权力模式转变为政治,但复兴法律的承诺正在死灰复燃。核心例子是拟议的《责任资本主义法》、《奖励工作法》、工作场所民主法和《雇员养老金保障法》。他们将为员工创造一项权利,让他们在价值10亿美元的公司董事会中选举40%的董事,让员工在其他上市公司董事会选举三分之一的董事,并要求一半的员工代表参加单一雇主养老金计划。所有这些都挑战了长期以来的神话:劳工参与公司治理与美国传统不同,当劳工的声音被编入法律时,在经济上效率低下,在经济中拥有声音的合法方式是购买股票,或者劳工的声音面临着难以逾越的法律障碍。本文通过对1861年以来的历史和证据的探索,表明这些神话是错误的。美国拥有世界上最强大的民主传统之一。经济民主之所以没有如此广泛,主要是因为它受到了法律的压制。美国人喜欢在工作中发声,而用“别人的钱”垄断股东投票的资产管理公司则根本没有合法性。文章的结论是,即使没有联邦政府,通过将自己重塑为民主和企业的实验室,各州也可以调整当前的提案,重建一部活生生的法律。(2019)42《西雅图大学法律评论》697。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信