Making sense of external partnerships

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Susanne Sahlin
{"title":"Making sense of external partnerships","authors":"Susanne Sahlin","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-02-2019-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to examine principals’ sense-making of a school–university collaboration taking an institutional perspective on organizational change. The study’s context involves three schools in a collaboration focusing on leadership and school improvement with one university.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study draws on findings from a qualitative case study that examined principals’ sense-making of this type of school–university collaboration. Data were collected over three years and consisted of semistructured interviews, meeting notes, field observations, field notes and document analysis. A qualitative content analysis was performed using the Atlas.ti 6.2 software tool.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings showed that mattering sense-making for the principals in this collaboration is related to the cultivation of collective participation and responsibility, the development of trust and improvement culture among actors, and the sense of moving towards research-based and collaborative learning-oriented practices in their schools.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study encountered several limitations that need to be addressed and recognized. First, the small number of cases in this multiple case study, as well as the specific social context, limits the possibilities for the generalization of the findings. Second, the study was not independently selected and the findings and analyses were linked to national and local contexts, which can be seen as a limitation and a strength. Nevertheless, this study provides in-depth information about the principals’ experiences and constructions of meaning as they helped lead a school–university collaboration in their schools. Finally, although the sample was small and not representative, the findings provided useful insights into and examples of how principals understand and interpret a school–university partnership in their schools’ improvement processes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe findings provide an elaborated illustration of how intentional efforts to collaborate and develop the schools in a school–university partnership may affect the regulative, normative and cultural–cognitive aspects in schools.\n","PeriodicalId":44790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jpcc-02-2019-0004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-02-2019-0004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine principals’ sense-making of a school–university collaboration taking an institutional perspective on organizational change. The study’s context involves three schools in a collaboration focusing on leadership and school improvement with one university. Design/methodology/approach The study draws on findings from a qualitative case study that examined principals’ sense-making of this type of school–university collaboration. Data were collected over three years and consisted of semistructured interviews, meeting notes, field observations, field notes and document analysis. A qualitative content analysis was performed using the Atlas.ti 6.2 software tool. Findings The findings showed that mattering sense-making for the principals in this collaboration is related to the cultivation of collective participation and responsibility, the development of trust and improvement culture among actors, and the sense of moving towards research-based and collaborative learning-oriented practices in their schools. Research limitations/implications This study encountered several limitations that need to be addressed and recognized. First, the small number of cases in this multiple case study, as well as the specific social context, limits the possibilities for the generalization of the findings. Second, the study was not independently selected and the findings and analyses were linked to national and local contexts, which can be seen as a limitation and a strength. Nevertheless, this study provides in-depth information about the principals’ experiences and constructions of meaning as they helped lead a school–university collaboration in their schools. Finally, although the sample was small and not representative, the findings provided useful insights into and examples of how principals understand and interpret a school–university partnership in their schools’ improvement processes. Originality/value The findings provide an elaborated illustration of how intentional efforts to collaborate and develop the schools in a school–university partnership may affect the regulative, normative and cultural–cognitive aspects in schools.
理解外部伙伴关系
目的本文的目的是从组织变革的制度视角考察校长对学校-大学合作的理解。这项研究的背景涉及三所学校与一所大学的合作,重点是领导力和学校改进。设计/方法论/方法本研究借鉴了一项定性案例研究的结果,该研究考察了校长对这种类型的学校-大学合作的理解。数据收集历时三年,包括半结构化访谈、会议记录、实地观察、实地记录和文件分析。使用Atlas.ti 6.2软件工具进行定性内容分析。研究结果表明,在这种合作中,对校长来说,重要的意义在于培养集体参与和责任感,培养参与者之间的信任和改进文化,以及在学校中走向研究性和协作性学习实践的意识。研究局限性/含义本研究遇到了一些需要解决和认识的局限性。首先,这项多案例研究中的案例数量较少,以及特定的社会背景,限制了研究结果的泛化可能性。其次,这项研究不是独立选择的,研究结果和分析与国家和地方背景有关,这可以被视为一种局限性和优势。然而,这项研究提供了关于校长在帮助领导学校合作时的经验和意义建构的深入信息。最后,尽管样本很小,不具有代表性,但研究结果为校长如何理解和解释学校改进过程中的学校-大学伙伴关系提供了有用的见解和例子。原创性/价值研究结果详细说明了在学校-大学合作关系中,有意合作和发展学校的努力如何影响学校的调节、规范和文化认知方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Journal of Professional Capital and Community EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信