The Clinical Learning Environments of Undergraduate Nursing Students in Iran Context: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study

Z. Ghahremani, M. Moqaddam, M. Asgari, S. Ebrahimi, K. Amini
{"title":"The Clinical Learning Environments of Undergraduate Nursing Students in Iran Context: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study","authors":"Z. Ghahremani, M. Moqaddam, M. Asgari, S. Ebrahimi, K. Amini","doi":"10.52547/pcnm.12.4.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical environments are one of the most effective areas for acquiring the clinical skills of nursing students. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the actual and preferential clinical learning environments. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from March 1, 2019, to February 6, 2020 in Zanjan province. Samples included 380 nursing students who had the experience of one semester of internship were entered the study by stratified random sampling. Data collection tools were the Demographic Profile Questionnaire and Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI). The range of CLEI scores in both actual and preference learning environments is equal to 42-168. We analyzed data using SPSS software, version 22.0. We used descriptive and inferential statistics included independent t-test and one-way ANOVA to analyze the data. A significance level of 0.05 was considered. Results : The mean (SD) score of the actual clinical learning environment was 109.50(12.25), and the preferred learning environment was 131.08 (14.54). The difference between the two variables was statistically significant (t=22.39, P<0.001). There was a difference in the mean of some dimensions of the nursing students' preference and actual forms of clinical learning environment based on educational grade, different internships. Conclusion: There is a significant difference between the actual learning environment and students' expectations. This finding emphasizes the need for attention by managers and decision-makers in nursing education to change and improve the clinical learning environment.","PeriodicalId":53068,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Care in Nursing and Midwifery Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Care in Nursing and Midwifery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/pcnm.12.4.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical environments are one of the most effective areas for acquiring the clinical skills of nursing students. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the actual and preferential clinical learning environments. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from March 1, 2019, to February 6, 2020 in Zanjan province. Samples included 380 nursing students who had the experience of one semester of internship were entered the study by stratified random sampling. Data collection tools were the Demographic Profile Questionnaire and Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI). The range of CLEI scores in both actual and preference learning environments is equal to 42-168. We analyzed data using SPSS software, version 22.0. We used descriptive and inferential statistics included independent t-test and one-way ANOVA to analyze the data. A significance level of 0.05 was considered. Results : The mean (SD) score of the actual clinical learning environment was 109.50(12.25), and the preferred learning environment was 131.08 (14.54). The difference between the two variables was statistically significant (t=22.39, P<0.001). There was a difference in the mean of some dimensions of the nursing students' preference and actual forms of clinical learning environment based on educational grade, different internships. Conclusion: There is a significant difference between the actual learning environment and students' expectations. This finding emphasizes the need for attention by managers and decision-makers in nursing education to change and improve the clinical learning environment.
伊朗背景下护理本科生临床学习环境的跨部门多中心研究
背景:临床环境是护理学生获得临床技能最有效的领域之一。目的:本研究旨在评价和比较实际的和优选的临床学习环境。方法:本横断面研究于2019年3月1日至2020年2月6日在赞詹省进行。本研究采用分层随机抽样的方法,选取有一学期实习经历的护生380人。数据收集工具为人口统计问卷和临床学习环境量表(CLEI)。实际学习环境和偏好学习环境的CLEI得分范围均为42-168。我们使用SPSS 22.0版软件分析数据。我们采用描述性统计和推断性统计,包括独立t检验和单因素方差分析。认为显著性水平为0.05。结果:临床实际学习环境的平均(SD)得分为109.50分(12.25分),首选学习环境得分为131.08分(14.54分)。两变量间差异有统计学意义(t=22.39, P<0.001)。护生对临床学习环境的偏好和实际学习环境的一些维度的均值在不同学历、不同实习经历的情况下存在差异。结论:实际学习环境与学生期望存在显著差异。这一发现强调护理教育的管理者和决策者需要注意改变和改善临床学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信