Enterprise Foundations as ‘Non-profit Organizations’ Under the EU Pillar Two Directive

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
Intertax Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2023048
Mark Ørberg, Louise Blichfeldt Fjord
{"title":"Enterprise Foundations as ‘Non-profit Organizations’ Under the EU Pillar Two Directive","authors":"Mark Ørberg, Louise Blichfeldt Fjord","doi":"10.54648/taxi2023048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors explore the highly debated 15% minimum corporate tax rate better known as Pillar Two. More specifically, the focus is on ‘public good enterprise foundations’ and the potential applicability of the ‘non-profit organization’ definition in the EU Pillar Two Directive (2022/ 2523) from December 2022. A public good enterprise foundation typically controls one or more operating enterprises but can only distribute income to the public good purposes stipulated in the foundation charter. This ‘distribution restraint’ is supplemented by a ‘disbursement duty’ as the governing board must make distributions to the foundation’s public good purposes. In some instances, the founder has – in addition to one or more public good purposes – explicitly stipulated ownership of (specific) operating entities for the purpose of raising funds for the public good purposes in the charter. Consequently, whereas corporations make profit for their owners, the public good enterprise foundation’s purpose is not to operate for profit-making but instead to operate for promotion of the public good purpose in the foundation charter.\nIllustrated by Danish public good enterprise foundations (DK: Erhvervsdrivende fonde), it is analysed whether public good enterprise foundations in Europe should be considered as ‘non-profit organizations’ excluded from the EU Pillar Two Directive despite owning (controlling) interests in operating entities that are conducting commercial business. The impact is significant as this would exclude the income and tax of the public good enterprise foundations (and their holding companies) when calculating the jurisdictional effective tax rate of the group and prevent the application of the income inclusion rule and the under taxed payment rule on their income. While self-owned foundations may be unfamiliar in some Member States, it will have significant impact on other Member States such as Denmark where some of the largest businesses (e.g., Maersk, Novo Nordisk, Carlsberg, and Lundbeck) are owned by such public good enterprise foundations. The authors argue they should be considered as non-profit organizations and therefore excluded entities under the Directive.\nNon-profit definition, International tax law, EU tax law, Pillar II, EU Directive 2022/2523, Enterprise foundations, Industrial foundations, Foundation purpose, Foundation objective","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2023048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors explore the highly debated 15% minimum corporate tax rate better known as Pillar Two. More specifically, the focus is on ‘public good enterprise foundations’ and the potential applicability of the ‘non-profit organization’ definition in the EU Pillar Two Directive (2022/ 2523) from December 2022. A public good enterprise foundation typically controls one or more operating enterprises but can only distribute income to the public good purposes stipulated in the foundation charter. This ‘distribution restraint’ is supplemented by a ‘disbursement duty’ as the governing board must make distributions to the foundation’s public good purposes. In some instances, the founder has – in addition to one or more public good purposes – explicitly stipulated ownership of (specific) operating entities for the purpose of raising funds for the public good purposes in the charter. Consequently, whereas corporations make profit for their owners, the public good enterprise foundation’s purpose is not to operate for profit-making but instead to operate for promotion of the public good purpose in the foundation charter. Illustrated by Danish public good enterprise foundations (DK: Erhvervsdrivende fonde), it is analysed whether public good enterprise foundations in Europe should be considered as ‘non-profit organizations’ excluded from the EU Pillar Two Directive despite owning (controlling) interests in operating entities that are conducting commercial business. The impact is significant as this would exclude the income and tax of the public good enterprise foundations (and their holding companies) when calculating the jurisdictional effective tax rate of the group and prevent the application of the income inclusion rule and the under taxed payment rule on their income. While self-owned foundations may be unfamiliar in some Member States, it will have significant impact on other Member States such as Denmark where some of the largest businesses (e.g., Maersk, Novo Nordisk, Carlsberg, and Lundbeck) are owned by such public good enterprise foundations. The authors argue they should be considered as non-profit organizations and therefore excluded entities under the Directive. Non-profit definition, International tax law, EU tax law, Pillar II, EU Directive 2022/2523, Enterprise foundations, Industrial foundations, Foundation purpose, Foundation objective
企业基金会是欧盟第二支柱指令下的“非营利组织”
作者探讨了备受争议的15%的最低公司税率,即第二支柱。更具体地说,从2022年12月起,重点是“公益企业基金会”和欧盟第二支柱指令(2022/2523)中“非营利组织”定义的潜在适用性。公益企业基金会通常控制一个或多个运营企业,但只能将收入分配给基金会章程中规定的公益用途。这种“分配限制”由“支付义务”补充,因为董事会必须为基金会的公共利益进行分配。在某些情况下,除了一个或多个公益目的外,创始人还明确规定了(特定)经营实体的所有权,以在章程中为公益目的筹集资金。因此,尽管公司为其所有者盈利,但公益企业基金会的目的不是为了盈利,而是为了促进基金会章程中的公益目的。丹麦公益企业基金会(DK:Erhvervsdrivende fode)对此进行了说明,分析了欧洲的公益企业基金是否应被视为“非营利组织”,被排除在欧盟第二支柱指令之外,尽管其在开展商业业务的运营实体中拥有(控制)权益。影响是重大的,因为这将在计算集团的管辖有效税率时排除公益企业基金会(及其控股公司)的收入和税收,并防止对其收入适用收入包含规则和纳税不足的支付规则。虽然一些成员国可能不熟悉自有基金会,但它将对丹麦等其他成员国产生重大影响,丹麦的一些最大企业(如马士基、诺和诺德、嘉士伯和伦德贝克)由此类公益企业基金会所有。作者认为,它们应被视为非营利组织,因此被排除在指令之外。非营利定义、国际税法、欧盟税法、支柱II、欧盟指令2022/2523、企业基金会、工业基金会、基金会宗旨、基金会目标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信