A Different Perspective (?): Air Warfare in Derek Robinson’s Post-Memory Aviation Fiction

IF 0.3 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
Marzena Sokołowska-Paryż
{"title":"A Different Perspective (?): Air Warfare in Derek Robinson’s Post-Memory Aviation Fiction","authors":"Marzena Sokołowska-Paryż","doi":"10.14198/RAEI.2018.31.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The canonical literary epitome of the Great War is, beyond doubt, the infantry soldier trapped in what Paul Fussell called the “troglodyte world” of the notorious trenches. There exists, however, a considerable number of literary accounts devoted to a different ‘space’—and thus allegedly also a different experience—of the conflict. The autobiography by Manfred von Richthofen, and memoirs by Billy Bishop and Cecil Lewis contributed to the fame of the Great War pilots as ‘knights of the air.’ Post-memory literary depictions of air warfare tend to be more ideologically ambivalent. The focus of this paper will be Derek Robinson’s novel War Story (1987), constituting in terms of the chosen historical time of its action the first part of his acclaimed Great War aviation trilogy, including also Goshawk Squadron and Hornet's Sting, to be analyzed within the wider context of the cultural representations of the Royal Flying Corps in 1914–1918. Derek Robinson served in the RAF after the Second World War. He is also the author of the revisionist Invasion, 1940 and, thus, his literary ‘return’ to the Great War, within the context of air warfare, must raise important questions concerning the extent to which he perpetuates or challenges the prevailing myths of the first global conflict of the twentieth-century.","PeriodicalId":33428,"journal":{"name":"Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/RAEI.2018.31.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The canonical literary epitome of the Great War is, beyond doubt, the infantry soldier trapped in what Paul Fussell called the “troglodyte world” of the notorious trenches. There exists, however, a considerable number of literary accounts devoted to a different ‘space’—and thus allegedly also a different experience—of the conflict. The autobiography by Manfred von Richthofen, and memoirs by Billy Bishop and Cecil Lewis contributed to the fame of the Great War pilots as ‘knights of the air.’ Post-memory literary depictions of air warfare tend to be more ideologically ambivalent. The focus of this paper will be Derek Robinson’s novel War Story (1987), constituting in terms of the chosen historical time of its action the first part of his acclaimed Great War aviation trilogy, including also Goshawk Squadron and Hornet's Sting, to be analyzed within the wider context of the cultural representations of the Royal Flying Corps in 1914–1918. Derek Robinson served in the RAF after the Second World War. He is also the author of the revisionist Invasion, 1940 and, thus, his literary ‘return’ to the Great War, within the context of air warfare, must raise important questions concerning the extent to which he perpetuates or challenges the prevailing myths of the first global conflict of the twentieth-century.
不同的视角(?):德里克·罗宾逊后记忆航空小说中的空战
毫无疑问,第一次世界大战的经典文学缩影是被困在保罗·福塞尔(Paul Fussell)所说的臭名昭著的战壕“穴居人世界”中的步兵。然而,有相当多的文学作品致力于一个不同的“空间”——因此据说也有不同的冲突经历。曼弗雷德·冯·里希特霍芬的自传、比利·毕晓普和塞西尔·刘易斯的回忆录使第一次世界大战飞行员成为“空中骑士”。后记忆时代的文学作品对空战的描述往往在意识形态上更加矛盾。本文的重点将是德里克·罗宾逊的小说《战争故事》(1987),根据其所选择的历史时间,构成了他广受赞誉的《大战》航空三部曲的第一部分,包括苍鹰中队和大黄蜂的刺,在1914-1918年皇家飞行队文化表征的更广泛背景下进行分析。德里克·罗宾逊二战后在英国皇家空军服役。他也是《1940年的修正主义入侵》的作者,因此,他的文学“回归”到第一次世界大战,在空战的背景下,必须提出重要的问题,即他在多大程度上延续或挑战了20世纪第一次全球冲突的流行神话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses
Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信