The future of coordination is smart coordination

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
H. Vrijhoef
{"title":"The future of coordination is smart coordination","authors":"H. Vrijhoef","doi":"10.1177/20534345221075661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Healthcare delivery models are under intensifying pressure as health systems struggle with various challenges including employee burnout, workforce shortages, equipment scarcities, and outdated facilities. The COVID-19 pandemic has magnified the importance of coordination to secure access to and navigation between health services. By facilitating coordination within and between services, the goal is to guide people quickly to the level of care they need and prevent instances of those receiving too much or too little care or no care at all. Further, the COVID-19 pandemic has promoted the use of telehealth and digital services while continued implementation and utilization of modern technological advances are recommended for various target populations. Technology-enabled or digital innovation is accelerating the healthcare delivery models and ecosystems of tomorrow. The main feature of tomorrow’s healthcare delivery models and ecosystems is that these models and systems are about bringing care to the patient, rather than bringing the patient to care. As health care will become further decentralized, coordination is conditional for people to take advantage of the full range of (new) services. Historical review has shown that ill-coordinated or disjoined health initiatives lead to vertical or stand-alone information and communication technology applications that often result in information fragmentation and, consequently, poor delivery of services. To move into the future, healthcare models and ecosystems will need to become smart. They need to become highly technologically advanced and interconnected. Such transformation requires the participation of all stakeholders. Data sharing among all entities is crucial to ensure that patients receive high-quality healthcare efficiently and conveniently. Similar to change management and changes themselves, the best results are to be expected when as much attention is paid to coordination as to what needs to get coordinated. It is then when coordination becomes smart coordination to enable timely, convenient, and efficient patient and provider experiences. In this issue of the International Journal of Care Coordination, Shook et al. address the question of what tools improve care coordination for children with special health care needs. Their scoping review provides useful insights into the potential of telehealth, online health records, care plans, inpatient discharge protocols, family training, and reminders to address gaps impeding pediatric traumatic brain injury care coordination. The same authors also reviewed scientific literature on child and family outcomes when care coordinators are implemented as an intervention to facilitate long-term management of children with special health care needs. They found that utilization of care coordinators in different forms generally resulted in positive outcomes in terms of healthcare utilization, costs of care, disease status, parent and child quality of life, and healthcare satisfaction and perception of care. Future research is recommended to better understand which form of care coordination best matches specific care needs. By calculating a continuity of care index, Medves et al. studied the association between continuity of care and unplanned health service utilization in persons with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in a rural health region in Ontario, Canada. A lower use of unplanned health services was observed in the cohort of patients experiencing higher continuity of care. It would, as the authors recommend, indeed be interesting to see whether the new option of virtual care improves continuity of care. The final paper in this issue reports on a qualitative study of the perceptions of Finnish health and social care professionals about client orientation as key principle of health and social care services. Kallio et al. point out that although client orientation occurs between a client and a professional, it can only happen in interprofessional collaboration and if the right regulations and contributory organizational structures run throughout all service provision. It is in this regard that authors report technology could enable and enhance information sharing between professionals so that they can serve their clients better. For this, the information systems used by different organizations need to be compatible to ensure smooth and smart data transfer.","PeriodicalId":43751,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Coordination","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20534345221075661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare delivery models are under intensifying pressure as health systems struggle with various challenges including employee burnout, workforce shortages, equipment scarcities, and outdated facilities. The COVID-19 pandemic has magnified the importance of coordination to secure access to and navigation between health services. By facilitating coordination within and between services, the goal is to guide people quickly to the level of care they need and prevent instances of those receiving too much or too little care or no care at all. Further, the COVID-19 pandemic has promoted the use of telehealth and digital services while continued implementation and utilization of modern technological advances are recommended for various target populations. Technology-enabled or digital innovation is accelerating the healthcare delivery models and ecosystems of tomorrow. The main feature of tomorrow’s healthcare delivery models and ecosystems is that these models and systems are about bringing care to the patient, rather than bringing the patient to care. As health care will become further decentralized, coordination is conditional for people to take advantage of the full range of (new) services. Historical review has shown that ill-coordinated or disjoined health initiatives lead to vertical or stand-alone information and communication technology applications that often result in information fragmentation and, consequently, poor delivery of services. To move into the future, healthcare models and ecosystems will need to become smart. They need to become highly technologically advanced and interconnected. Such transformation requires the participation of all stakeholders. Data sharing among all entities is crucial to ensure that patients receive high-quality healthcare efficiently and conveniently. Similar to change management and changes themselves, the best results are to be expected when as much attention is paid to coordination as to what needs to get coordinated. It is then when coordination becomes smart coordination to enable timely, convenient, and efficient patient and provider experiences. In this issue of the International Journal of Care Coordination, Shook et al. address the question of what tools improve care coordination for children with special health care needs. Their scoping review provides useful insights into the potential of telehealth, online health records, care plans, inpatient discharge protocols, family training, and reminders to address gaps impeding pediatric traumatic brain injury care coordination. The same authors also reviewed scientific literature on child and family outcomes when care coordinators are implemented as an intervention to facilitate long-term management of children with special health care needs. They found that utilization of care coordinators in different forms generally resulted in positive outcomes in terms of healthcare utilization, costs of care, disease status, parent and child quality of life, and healthcare satisfaction and perception of care. Future research is recommended to better understand which form of care coordination best matches specific care needs. By calculating a continuity of care index, Medves et al. studied the association between continuity of care and unplanned health service utilization in persons with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in a rural health region in Ontario, Canada. A lower use of unplanned health services was observed in the cohort of patients experiencing higher continuity of care. It would, as the authors recommend, indeed be interesting to see whether the new option of virtual care improves continuity of care. The final paper in this issue reports on a qualitative study of the perceptions of Finnish health and social care professionals about client orientation as key principle of health and social care services. Kallio et al. point out that although client orientation occurs between a client and a professional, it can only happen in interprofessional collaboration and if the right regulations and contributory organizational structures run throughout all service provision. It is in this regard that authors report technology could enable and enhance information sharing between professionals so that they can serve their clients better. For this, the information systems used by different organizations need to be compatible to ensure smooth and smart data transfer.
协调的未来是智能协调
随着卫生系统面临各种挑战,包括员工倦怠、劳动力短缺、设备稀缺和设施过时,医疗保健服务模式面临越来越大的压力。2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了协调以确保获得卫生服务和在卫生服务之间导航的重要性。通过促进服务内部和服务之间的协调,目标是引导人们迅速获得所需的护理水平,并防止那些获得过多或过少护理或根本没有护理的情况。此外,2019冠状病毒病大流行促进了远程保健和数字服务的使用,同时建议各目标人群继续实施和利用现代技术进步。技术驱动或数字创新正在加速未来的医疗保健服务模式和生态系统。未来医疗保健服务模式和生态系统的主要特征是,这些模式和系统是关于为患者提供护理,而不是将患者带到护理中。由于卫生保健将进一步分散,协调是人们利用各种(新)服务的条件。历史回顾表明,协调不良或脱节的卫生举措导致垂直或独立的信息和通信技术应用,往往导致信息碎片化,从而导致服务提供不良。为了迈向未来,医疗模式和生态系统需要变得更加智能。它们需要在技术上变得高度先进和相互联系。这种转变需要所有利益相关者的参与。所有实体之间的数据共享对于确保患者高效、便捷地获得高质量的医疗保健至关重要。与变更管理和变更本身类似,当对协调的关注与对需要协调的关注一样多时,期望得到最好的结果。只有这样,协调才能成为智能协调,从而实现及时、方便和高效的患者和提供者体验。在本期的《国际护理协调杂志》中,Shook等人探讨了什么样的工具可以改善有特殊保健需求的儿童的护理协调。他们的范围审查为远程医疗、在线健康记录、护理计划、住院出院协议、家庭培训和提醒解决阻碍儿科创伤性脑损伤护理协调的差距提供了有用的见解。同一组作者还审查了关于将护理协调员作为一种干预措施实施以促进对有特殊卫生保健需求的儿童的长期管理时儿童和家庭结果的科学文献。他们发现,在医疗保健利用、护理成本、疾病状况、父母和儿童生活质量、医疗保健满意度和护理感知方面,不同形式的护理协调员的使用通常会产生积极的结果。建议未来的研究以更好地了解哪种形式的护理协调最符合特定的护理需求。Medves等人通过计算护理连续性指数,研究了加拿大安大略省农村卫生地区慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的护理连续性与计划外卫生服务利用之间的关系。在经历较高连续性护理的患者队列中,观察到较低的非计划保健服务使用率。正如作者所建议的那样,看看虚拟护理的新选择是否能提高护理的连续性,这确实很有趣。这一期的最后一篇论文报告了芬兰卫生和社会保健专业人员关于以客户为导向作为卫生和社会保健服务关键原则的看法的定性研究。Kallio等人指出,虽然客户导向发生在客户和专业人员之间,但它只能发生在跨专业合作中,并且如果正确的法规和有益的组织结构贯穿于所有服务提供中。正是在这方面,作者报告说,技术可以实现和加强专业人员之间的信息共享,以便他们能够更好地为客户服务。为此,不同组织使用的信息系统需要兼容,以确保平稳和智能的数据传输。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Care Coordination (formerly published as the International Journal of Care Pathways) provides an international forum for the latest scientific research in care coordination. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles which describe basic research to a multidisciplinary field as well as other broader approaches and strategies hypothesized to improve care coordination. The Journal offers insightful overviews and reflections on innovation, underlying issues, and thought provoking opinion pieces in related fields. Articles from multidisciplinary fields are welcomed from leading health care academics and policy-makers. Published articles types include original research, reviews, guidelines papers, book reviews, and news items.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信