Tongtong Liu, Joe McCalmon, Thai Le, Md Asifur Rahman, Dongwon Lee, Sarra Alqahtani
{"title":"A novel policy-graph approach with natural language and counterfactual abstractions for explaining reinforcement learning agents","authors":"Tongtong Liu, Joe McCalmon, Thai Le, Md Asifur Rahman, Dongwon Lee, Sarra Alqahtani","doi":"10.1007/s10458-023-09615-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As reinforcement learning (RL) continues to improve and be applied in situations alongside humans, the need to explain the learned behaviors of RL agents to end-users becomes more important. Strategies for explaining the reasoning behind an agent’s policy, called <i>policy-level explanations</i>, can lead to important insights about both the task and the agent’s behaviors. Following this line of research, in this work, we propose a novel approach, named as <span>CAPS</span>, that summarizes an agent’s policy in the form of a directed graph with natural language descriptions. A decision tree based clustering method is utilized to abstract the state space of the task into fewer, condensed states which makes the policy graphs more digestible to end-users. We then use the user-defined predicates to enrich the abstract states with semantic meaning. To introduce counterfactual state explanations to the policy graph, we first identify the critical states in the graph then develop a novel counterfactual explanation method based on action perturbation in those critical states. We generate explanation graphs using <span>CAPS</span> on 5 RL tasks, using both deterministic and stochastic policies. We also evaluate the effectiveness of CAPS on human participants who are not RL experts in two user studies. When provided with our explanation graph, end-users are able to accurately interpret policies of trained RL agents 80% of the time, compared to 10% when provided with the next best baseline and <span>\\(68.2\\%\\)</span> of users demonstrated an increase in their confidence in understanding an agent’s behavior after provided with the counterfactual explanations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55586,"journal":{"name":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","volume":"37 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10458-023-09615-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
As reinforcement learning (RL) continues to improve and be applied in situations alongside humans, the need to explain the learned behaviors of RL agents to end-users becomes more important. Strategies for explaining the reasoning behind an agent’s policy, called policy-level explanations, can lead to important insights about both the task and the agent’s behaviors. Following this line of research, in this work, we propose a novel approach, named as CAPS, that summarizes an agent’s policy in the form of a directed graph with natural language descriptions. A decision tree based clustering method is utilized to abstract the state space of the task into fewer, condensed states which makes the policy graphs more digestible to end-users. We then use the user-defined predicates to enrich the abstract states with semantic meaning. To introduce counterfactual state explanations to the policy graph, we first identify the critical states in the graph then develop a novel counterfactual explanation method based on action perturbation in those critical states. We generate explanation graphs using CAPS on 5 RL tasks, using both deterministic and stochastic policies. We also evaluate the effectiveness of CAPS on human participants who are not RL experts in two user studies. When provided with our explanation graph, end-users are able to accurately interpret policies of trained RL agents 80% of the time, compared to 10% when provided with the next best baseline and \(68.2\%\) of users demonstrated an increase in their confidence in understanding an agent’s behavior after provided with the counterfactual explanations.
期刊介绍:
This is the official journal of the International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. It provides a leading forum for disseminating significant original research results in the foundations, theory, development, analysis, and applications of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Coverage in Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems includes, but is not limited to:
Agent decision-making architectures and their evaluation, including: cognitive models; knowledge representation; logics for agency; ontological reasoning; planning (single and multi-agent); reasoning (single and multi-agent)
Cooperation and teamwork, including: distributed problem solving; human-robot/agent interaction; multi-user/multi-virtual-agent interaction; coalition formation; coordination
Agent communication languages, including: their semantics, pragmatics, and implementation; agent communication protocols and conversations; agent commitments; speech act theory
Ontologies for agent systems, agents and the semantic web, agents and semantic web services, Grid-based systems, and service-oriented computing
Agent societies and societal issues, including: artificial social systems; environments, organizations and institutions; ethical and legal issues; privacy, safety and security; trust, reliability and reputation
Agent-based system development, including: agent development techniques, tools and environments; agent programming languages; agent specification or validation languages
Agent-based simulation, including: emergent behavior; participatory simulation; simulation techniques, tools and environments; social simulation
Agreement technologies, including: argumentation; collective decision making; judgment aggregation and belief merging; negotiation; norms
Economic paradigms, including: auction and mechanism design; bargaining and negotiation; economically-motivated agents; game theory (cooperative and non-cooperative); social choice and voting
Learning agents, including: computational architectures for learning agents; evolution, adaptation; multi-agent learning.
Robotic agents, including: integrated perception, cognition, and action; cognitive robotics; robot planning (including action and motion planning); multi-robot systems.
Virtual agents, including: agents in games and virtual environments; companion and coaching agents; modeling personality, emotions; multimodal interaction; verbal and non-verbal expressiveness
Significant, novel applications of agent technology
Comprehensive reviews and authoritative tutorials of research and practice in agent systems
Comprehensive and authoritative reviews of books dealing with agents and multi-agent systems.