A novel policy-graph approach with natural language and counterfactual abstractions for explaining reinforcement learning agents

IF 2 3区 计算机科学 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Tongtong Liu, Joe McCalmon, Thai Le, Md Asifur Rahman, Dongwon Lee, Sarra Alqahtani
{"title":"A novel policy-graph approach with natural language and counterfactual abstractions for explaining reinforcement learning agents","authors":"Tongtong Liu,&nbsp;Joe McCalmon,&nbsp;Thai Le,&nbsp;Md Asifur Rahman,&nbsp;Dongwon Lee,&nbsp;Sarra Alqahtani","doi":"10.1007/s10458-023-09615-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As reinforcement learning (RL) continues to improve and be applied in situations alongside humans, the need to explain the learned behaviors of RL agents to end-users becomes more important. Strategies for explaining the reasoning behind an agent’s policy, called <i>policy-level explanations</i>, can lead to important insights about both the task and the agent’s behaviors. Following this line of research, in this work, we propose a novel approach, named as <span>CAPS</span>, that summarizes an agent’s policy in the form of a directed graph with natural language descriptions. A decision tree based clustering method is utilized to abstract the state space of the task into fewer, condensed states which makes the policy graphs more digestible to end-users. We then use the user-defined predicates to enrich the abstract states with semantic meaning. To introduce counterfactual state explanations to the policy graph, we first identify the critical states in the graph then develop a novel counterfactual explanation method based on action perturbation in those critical states. We generate explanation graphs using <span>CAPS</span> on 5 RL tasks, using both deterministic and stochastic policies. We also evaluate the effectiveness of CAPS on human participants who are not RL experts in two user studies. When provided with our explanation graph, end-users are able to accurately interpret policies of trained RL agents 80% of the time, compared to 10% when provided with the next best baseline and <span>\\(68.2\\%\\)</span> of users demonstrated an increase in their confidence in understanding an agent’s behavior after provided with the counterfactual explanations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55586,"journal":{"name":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","volume":"37 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10458-023-09615-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As reinforcement learning (RL) continues to improve and be applied in situations alongside humans, the need to explain the learned behaviors of RL agents to end-users becomes more important. Strategies for explaining the reasoning behind an agent’s policy, called policy-level explanations, can lead to important insights about both the task and the agent’s behaviors. Following this line of research, in this work, we propose a novel approach, named as CAPS, that summarizes an agent’s policy in the form of a directed graph with natural language descriptions. A decision tree based clustering method is utilized to abstract the state space of the task into fewer, condensed states which makes the policy graphs more digestible to end-users. We then use the user-defined predicates to enrich the abstract states with semantic meaning. To introduce counterfactual state explanations to the policy graph, we first identify the critical states in the graph then develop a novel counterfactual explanation method based on action perturbation in those critical states. We generate explanation graphs using CAPS on 5 RL tasks, using both deterministic and stochastic policies. We also evaluate the effectiveness of CAPS on human participants who are not RL experts in two user studies. When provided with our explanation graph, end-users are able to accurately interpret policies of trained RL agents 80% of the time, compared to 10% when provided with the next best baseline and \(68.2\%\) of users demonstrated an increase in their confidence in understanding an agent’s behavior after provided with the counterfactual explanations.

Abstract Image

用自然语言和反事实抽象的策略图方法解释强化学习代理
随着强化学习(RL)的不断改进并与人类一起应用于各种情况,向最终用户解释RL代理的学习行为变得更加重要。解释代理策略背后的推理的策略,称为策略级解释,可以导致对任务和代理行为的重要见解。根据这一研究思路,在这项工作中,我们提出了一种新的方法,称为CAPS,该方法以自然语言描述的有向图的形式总结代理的策略。利用基于决策树的聚类方法将任务的状态空间抽象为更少的压缩状态,这使得最终用户更容易理解策略图。然后,我们使用用户定义的谓词来丰富具有语义的抽象状态。为了将反事实状态解释引入到策略图中,我们首先识别图中的临界状态,然后基于这些临界状态中的动作扰动开发了一种新的反事实解释方法。我们在5个RL任务上使用CAPS生成解释图,同时使用确定性和随机策略。我们还在两项用户研究中评估了CAPS对非RL专家的人类参与者的有效性。当提供我们的解释图时,最终用户能够在80%的时间内准确解释经过训练的RL代理的策略,而当提供次优基线时,这一比例为10%,并且(68.2\%\)用户在提供反事实解释后,对理解代理行为的信心增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This is the official journal of the International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. It provides a leading forum for disseminating significant original research results in the foundations, theory, development, analysis, and applications of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Coverage in Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems includes, but is not limited to: Agent decision-making architectures and their evaluation, including: cognitive models; knowledge representation; logics for agency; ontological reasoning; planning (single and multi-agent); reasoning (single and multi-agent) Cooperation and teamwork, including: distributed problem solving; human-robot/agent interaction; multi-user/multi-virtual-agent interaction; coalition formation; coordination Agent communication languages, including: their semantics, pragmatics, and implementation; agent communication protocols and conversations; agent commitments; speech act theory Ontologies for agent systems, agents and the semantic web, agents and semantic web services, Grid-based systems, and service-oriented computing Agent societies and societal issues, including: artificial social systems; environments, organizations and institutions; ethical and legal issues; privacy, safety and security; trust, reliability and reputation Agent-based system development, including: agent development techniques, tools and environments; agent programming languages; agent specification or validation languages Agent-based simulation, including: emergent behavior; participatory simulation; simulation techniques, tools and environments; social simulation Agreement technologies, including: argumentation; collective decision making; judgment aggregation and belief merging; negotiation; norms Economic paradigms, including: auction and mechanism design; bargaining and negotiation; economically-motivated agents; game theory (cooperative and non-cooperative); social choice and voting Learning agents, including: computational architectures for learning agents; evolution, adaptation; multi-agent learning. Robotic agents, including: integrated perception, cognition, and action; cognitive robotics; robot planning (including action and motion planning); multi-robot systems. Virtual agents, including: agents in games and virtual environments; companion and coaching agents; modeling personality, emotions; multimodal interaction; verbal and non-verbal expressiveness Significant, novel applications of agent technology Comprehensive reviews and authoritative tutorials of research and practice in agent systems Comprehensive and authoritative reviews of books dealing with agents and multi-agent systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信