Conflitti separatisti. Caucaso meridionale, Europa orientale e Balcani (1991–2014) By Loretta Dell'Aguzzo. Roma: Carocci editore, 2020. 190 p., 21 Euros

IF 1.7 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
C. Pala
{"title":"Conflitti separatisti. Caucaso meridionale, Europa orientale e Balcani (1991–2014) By Loretta Dell'Aguzzo. Roma: Carocci editore, 2020. 190 p., 21 Euros","authors":"C. Pala","doi":"10.1017/ipo.2021.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political claims concerning state territorial transformation, secessionism and separatism still constitute a relatively understudied issue in political science. Scholars such as Radan (2012) have debated at length whether the study of separatism belongs more to International Relations or to domestic politics. Different scientific approaches seeking to analyse similar phenomena are sometimes rigidly framed by geographical area and local contexts (such as decolonization in Africa or pro-independence demands in Western Europe), with no or little regard for trans-national aspects. They may apply the same scientific concepts but fail to bridge epistemic diver-gences. Independentism, separatism, secessionism, annexationism, irredentism are striking examples of such an epistemic confusion. Moreover, scholars seldom contextualize these very different political phenomena, in spite of important regional and international contextual factors. Nonetheless, crucial issues comparative politics nations nationalism, regionalism, sub-state ethnic identities, regional/national culture and language, crucial explana-tory or intervening factors for understanding independentism and secessionism in general.","PeriodicalId":43368,"journal":{"name":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2021.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political claims concerning state territorial transformation, secessionism and separatism still constitute a relatively understudied issue in political science. Scholars such as Radan (2012) have debated at length whether the study of separatism belongs more to International Relations or to domestic politics. Different scientific approaches seeking to analyse similar phenomena are sometimes rigidly framed by geographical area and local contexts (such as decolonization in Africa or pro-independence demands in Western Europe), with no or little regard for trans-national aspects. They may apply the same scientific concepts but fail to bridge epistemic diver-gences. Independentism, separatism, secessionism, annexationism, irredentism are striking examples of such an epistemic confusion. Moreover, scholars seldom contextualize these very different political phenomena, in spite of important regional and international contextual factors. Nonetheless, crucial issues comparative politics nations nationalism, regionalism, sub-state ethnic identities, regional/national culture and language, crucial explana-tory or intervening factors for understanding independentism and secessionism in general.
分离主义冲突。南高加索、东欧和巴尔干(1991 - 2014)作者Loretta del aguzzo。罗马:卡罗奇出版社,2020年。190页,21欧元
关于国家领土转换、分裂主义和分离主义的政治主张,仍然是政治学研究相对不足的问题。Radan(2012)等学者对分离主义的研究是属于国际关系范畴还是属于国内政治范畴进行了详细的讨论。试图分析类似现象的不同科学方法有时受到地理区域和当地情况的严格限制(例如非洲的非殖民化或西欧的支持独立的要求),不考虑或很少考虑跨国方面。它们可能应用相同的科学概念,但无法弥合认识上的分歧。独立主义、分离主义、分离主义、兼并主义、统一主义就是这种认识混乱的显著例子。此外,尽管存在重要的区域和国际语境因素,学者们很少将这些截然不同的政治现象置于语境之中。然而,比较政治的关键问题是民族民族主义,地区主义,次国家民族认同,区域/民族文化和语言,理解独立主义和分离主义的关键解释或干预因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信