Comparison of the Acoustic Properties of Concert Halls (on the Example of Aesthetic Evaluation of the Sound of Musical Works)

O. Voitovych
{"title":"Comparison of the Acoustic Properties of Concert Halls (on the Example of Aesthetic Evaluation of the Sound of Musical Works)","authors":"O. Voitovych","doi":"10.31866/2616-7581.3.1.2020.204338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the method of aesthetic evaluation of the concert halls acoustics based on the properties of the perception of musical material by the human hearing system. For this purpose, a set of important evaluation criteria was defined: such as space, width, timbre, intelligibility, etc. Subjective evaluation criteria are closely interrelated and correlated with the objective acoustic parameters of concert halls. regular spectators of concerts and performances. The results of the survey were systematized and a comparative characteristic of classical music sounding in the two selected concert halls was given. The purpose of the research of the article is to offer a method of aesthetic evaluation of the acoustic properties of concert halls based on the subjective perception of the musical material sounding. The research methodology is determined by such methods as analytical – in the study of scientific literature; theoretical – to define specific terminology, to describe the phenomena that occur during the research and the parameters by which subjective assessment is done; empirical – when listening to orchestras in concert halls with a subsequent expert evaluation of the results; comparative – in the process of comparing research results; methods of analysis and synthesis – to process research results, and interviewing methods – to obtain information from musicians and active listeners. The scientific novelty of the research. It is made an attempt to compare the sound of orchestral music in different concert halls with the help of scientific study of subjective perception of musical material. Conclusions. Analyzing the results of the evaluation, we can say that the sound of the orchestras in the examined halls is significantly different. Each concert hall has its own individual and unique acoustics. Therefore, this should be taken into account when choosing a repertoire of concert groups and planning concerts. The application of aesthetic evaluation mechanism based on the subjective perception of the musical material sounding gives a positive result, so its use can be considered justified.","PeriodicalId":33441,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kiyivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu kul''turi i mistetstv Seriia Muzichne mistetstvo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kiyivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu kul''turi i mistetstv Seriia Muzichne mistetstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7581.3.1.2020.204338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article is devoted to the method of aesthetic evaluation of the concert halls acoustics based on the properties of the perception of musical material by the human hearing system. For this purpose, a set of important evaluation criteria was defined: such as space, width, timbre, intelligibility, etc. Subjective evaluation criteria are closely interrelated and correlated with the objective acoustic parameters of concert halls. regular spectators of concerts and performances. The results of the survey were systematized and a comparative characteristic of classical music sounding in the two selected concert halls was given. The purpose of the research of the article is to offer a method of aesthetic evaluation of the acoustic properties of concert halls based on the subjective perception of the musical material sounding. The research methodology is determined by such methods as analytical – in the study of scientific literature; theoretical – to define specific terminology, to describe the phenomena that occur during the research and the parameters by which subjective assessment is done; empirical – when listening to orchestras in concert halls with a subsequent expert evaluation of the results; comparative – in the process of comparing research results; methods of analysis and synthesis – to process research results, and interviewing methods – to obtain information from musicians and active listeners. The scientific novelty of the research. It is made an attempt to compare the sound of orchestral music in different concert halls with the help of scientific study of subjective perception of musical material. Conclusions. Analyzing the results of the evaluation, we can say that the sound of the orchestras in the examined halls is significantly different. Each concert hall has its own individual and unique acoustics. Therefore, this should be taken into account when choosing a repertoire of concert groups and planning concerts. The application of aesthetic evaluation mechanism based on the subjective perception of the musical material sounding gives a positive result, so its use can be considered justified.
音乐厅声学特性比较(以音乐作品声音的审美评价为例)
本文从人的听觉系统对音乐材料的感知特性出发,探讨了音乐厅声学的审美评价方法。为此,定义了一套重要的评价标准:如空间、宽度、音色、可理解性等。主观评价标准与音乐厅的客观声学参数密切相关、相互关联。音乐会和演出的忠实观众对调查结果进行了系统整理,并给出了两个选定音乐厅古典音乐发声的比较特点。本文的研究目的是提供一种基于对音乐材料发声的主观感知对音乐厅声学特性进行美学评价的方法。研究方法是由科学文献研究中的分析方法决定的;理论-定义具体术语,描述研究过程中发生的现象和进行主观评估的参数;经验性-在音乐厅听管弦乐队演奏时,随后有专家对结果进行评估;比较——在比较研究结果的过程中;分析和综合的方法-处理研究结果和访谈方法-从音乐家和活跃的听众那里获得信息。研究的科学新颖性。本文试图借助对音乐材料主观感知的科学研究,对不同音乐厅管弦乐的声音进行比较。结论。通过对评价结果的分析,我们可以说,在被检查的大厅里,管弦乐队的声音有很大的不同。每个音乐厅都有自己独特的音响效果。因此,在选择音乐会团体的曲目和规划音乐会时,应考虑到这一点。基于音乐材料声音主观感知的审美评价机制的应用取得了积极的效果,可以认为其使用是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书