Canopy responses of signal grass cv. Basilisk pastures subjected to three fertilization regimes at two stubble heights

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Bruna Scalia De Araújo Passos, V. R. Herling, Manoel Eduardo Rozalino Santos, L. R. Carvalho, L. E. T. Pereira
{"title":"Canopy responses of signal grass cv. Basilisk pastures subjected to three fertilization regimes at two stubble heights","authors":"Bruna Scalia De Araújo Passos, V. R. Herling, Manoel Eduardo Rozalino Santos, L. R. Carvalho, L. E. T. Pereira","doi":"10.17138/tgft(10)32-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impacts of fertilization regimes and stubble heights in signal grass cv. Basilisk pastures were evaluated during latespring and summer in Brazil. Liming and N, P and K fertilization were applied to generate gradients in soil fertility tomaintain soil base saturations around 35%, 50% and 65%, increase soil P concentration and the proportion of K in soilcation exchange capacity, combined with two stubble heights of 10 and 15 cm. Herbage accumulation was not affectedby fertilization regimes and stubble height reaching 10 t/ha of dry matter during the growing season. Cutting at 10cm maximizes the leaf mass and leaf area index and decreases dead material mass without the need of high soil basesaturation and NPK fertilization rates to sustain plant growth. However, this stubble height required longer regrowthperiods to attain 95% of light interception (LI95%). A stubble height of 15 cm is preferred when short regrowth periods are required. The canopy height at the point of LI95% does not change with fertilization regimes, but the LI95% is reached at different canopy heights in late spring and summer in signal grass pastures. The adoption of a moderate fertilization regime is recommended as a strategy to obtain an equitable forage distribution between late spring and summer.","PeriodicalId":56049,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17138/tgft(10)32-43","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impacts of fertilization regimes and stubble heights in signal grass cv. Basilisk pastures were evaluated during latespring and summer in Brazil. Liming and N, P and K fertilization were applied to generate gradients in soil fertility tomaintain soil base saturations around 35%, 50% and 65%, increase soil P concentration and the proportion of K in soilcation exchange capacity, combined with two stubble heights of 10 and 15 cm. Herbage accumulation was not affectedby fertilization regimes and stubble height reaching 10 t/ha of dry matter during the growing season. Cutting at 10cm maximizes the leaf mass and leaf area index and decreases dead material mass without the need of high soil basesaturation and NPK fertilization rates to sustain plant growth. However, this stubble height required longer regrowthperiods to attain 95% of light interception (LI95%). A stubble height of 15 cm is preferred when short regrowth periods are required. The canopy height at the point of LI95% does not change with fertilization regimes, but the LI95% is reached at different canopy heights in late spring and summer in signal grass pastures. The adoption of a moderate fertilization regime is recommended as a strategy to obtain an equitable forage distribution between late spring and summer.
三种施肥方式对信号草Basilisk牧场两茬高度冠层响应的影响
施肥制度和茬高对信号草的影响。在巴西的晚春和夏季对蛇怪牧场进行了评价。施用石灰和N、P、K肥,形成土壤肥力梯度,保持土壤碱基饱和度在35%、50%和65%左右,增加土壤磷浓度和钾在土壤交换容量中的比例,并结合10和15 cm两茬高。牧草积累不受施肥制度和干物质茬高达到10 t/ hm2的影响。在10cm处扦插可使叶片质量和叶面积指数最大化,减少死物质质量,而不需要高土壤碱饱和度和氮磷钾施肥量来维持植株生长。然而,这种残茬高度需要更长的再生周期才能达到95%的光拦截(LI95%)。当需要较短的再生期时,茬高最好为15厘米。在不同施肥方式下,LI95%点的冠层高度没有变化,但信号草牧场在春末和夏季不同的冠层高度均达到了LI95%。建议采用适度施肥制度作为在春末和夏季之间获得公平牧草分配的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales
Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes, in English or Spanish, Research Papers and Short Communications on research and development, as well as contributions from practitioners (Farmer Contributions) and Review Articles, related to pastures and forages in the tropics and subtropics. There is no regional focus; the information published should be of interest to a wide readership, encomprising researchers, academics, students, technicians, development workers and farmers. In general, the focus of the Journal is more on sown (''improved'') pastures and forages than on rangeland-specific aspects of natural grasslands, but exceptions are possible (e.g. when a submission is relevant for a particularly broad readership in the pasture and forage science community). The Journal will also consider the occasional publication of associated, but closely related, research in the form of an additional scientific communication platform [e.g. a re-make of the former Genetic Resources Communication series of the former Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia]. Areas of particular interest to the Journal are: Forage Genetic Resources and Livestock Production[...] Environmental Functions of Forages[...] Socio-economic Aspects[...] Topics within the aforementioned areas may include: Diversity evaluation; Agronomy; Establishment (including fertilization); Management and utilization; Animal production; Nutritive value; Biotic stresses (pests and diseases, weeds); Abiotic stresses (soil fertility, water, temperature); Genetics and breeding; Biogeography and germplasm collections; Seed production; Ecology; Physiology; Rhizobiology (including BNF, BNI, mycorrhizae); Forage conservation; Economics; Multilocational experimentation; Modelling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信