Whereof one cannot speak . . . but should try to

IF 0.3 4区哲学 0 LITERATURE

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2020-07-14 DOI:10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0279

Claudia Hilb

引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:The multiplicity of voices reflecting on the actual crisis shows that we are not looking at extreme dichotomies but are rather facing the coexistence of contradictory elements, or elements in tension, or a state of paradox. The essay tries to list these contradictory elements—newness or repetition? solidarity or egoism? local or global? private or public? democratic or autocratic outcome? nature or culture?—in an attempt to organize the current perplexity.

查看原文本刊更多论文

哪里不能说话。但应该试着

抽象：反映实际危机的声音的多样性表明，我们并不是在看极端的二分法，而是在面对矛盾因素的共存，或处于紧张状态的因素，或悖论状态。这篇文章试图列出这些矛盾的元素——新颖还是重复？团结还是利己主义？本地还是全球？私人还是公共？民主还是专制的结果？自然还是文化--试图整理当前的困惑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Multiple-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy and Rhetoric is dedicated to publication of high-quality articles involving the relationship between philosophy and rhetoric. It has a longstanding commitment to interdisciplinary scholarship and welcomes all theoretical and methodological perspectives that advance the journal"s mission. Philosophy and Rhetoric invites articles on such topics as the relationship between logic and rhetoric, the philosophical aspects of argumentation, philosophical views on the nature of rhetoric held by historical figures and during historical periods, psychological and sociological studies of rhetoric with a strong philosophical emphasis, and philosophical analyses of the relationship to rhetoric of other areas of human culture and thought, political theory and law.