Use of narratives to communicate organics with commodity grain farmers

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wesley Zebrowski, J. Farmer, Analena B. Bruce, S. Giroux, Stephanie Dickinson, Xiwei Chen, Michael O’Donnell, T. Benjamin
{"title":"Use of narratives to communicate organics with commodity grain farmers","authors":"Wesley Zebrowski, J. Farmer, Analena B. Bruce, S. Giroux, Stephanie Dickinson, Xiwei Chen, Michael O’Donnell, T. Benjamin","doi":"10.1017/S174217052300025X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While grain farming has seen a major shift toward organic production in recent years, the USA continues to lag behind with domestic demand continuing to outpace domestic supply, making the USA an all-around net importer. The Midwestern USA is poised to help remedy this imbalance; however, farmers continue to slowly transition to organic production systems. Existing literature has identified three prevalent narratives that farmers use to frame their organic transition: environmentalism, farm-family legacy and economic factors, in addition to a four and untested religiosity narrative. This study sought to better understand how these different narratives frame grain farmers’ thought processes for transitioning from conventional production systems to certified organic production systems. We co-created narratives around organic production with farmers, which resulted in four passages aligned with the literature: farm-family legacy, economic values, environmental values and Christianity and stewarding Eden. Then, we mailed a paper survey to conventional, in transition and certified organic Indiana grain farmers in order to test how these different narratives motivated organic production. We found that the most prevalent narrative around organic production is the farm-family legacy, which specifically resonated with midsize farmers. We also found that the religious stewardship narrative resonated with a substantial number of organic and mixed practice farmers, which is likely due to Amish farmers within the sample. These results shed light on the role that narratives and associated values play in organic practice use and can inform the organic efforts of agricultural professionals.","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S174217052300025X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract While grain farming has seen a major shift toward organic production in recent years, the USA continues to lag behind with domestic demand continuing to outpace domestic supply, making the USA an all-around net importer. The Midwestern USA is poised to help remedy this imbalance; however, farmers continue to slowly transition to organic production systems. Existing literature has identified three prevalent narratives that farmers use to frame their organic transition: environmentalism, farm-family legacy and economic factors, in addition to a four and untested religiosity narrative. This study sought to better understand how these different narratives frame grain farmers’ thought processes for transitioning from conventional production systems to certified organic production systems. We co-created narratives around organic production with farmers, which resulted in four passages aligned with the literature: farm-family legacy, economic values, environmental values and Christianity and stewarding Eden. Then, we mailed a paper survey to conventional, in transition and certified organic Indiana grain farmers in order to test how these different narratives motivated organic production. We found that the most prevalent narrative around organic production is the farm-family legacy, which specifically resonated with midsize farmers. We also found that the religious stewardship narrative resonated with a substantial number of organic and mixed practice farmers, which is likely due to Amish farmers within the sample. These results shed light on the role that narratives and associated values play in organic practice use and can inform the organic efforts of agricultural professionals.
使用叙事与商品粮食农民沟通有机
摘要尽管近年来粮食种植向有机生产转变,但美国仍然落后,国内需求继续超过国内供应,使美国成为全方位的净进口国。美国中西部地区准备帮助弥补这种不平衡;然而,农民继续缓慢地向有机生产系统过渡。现有文献已经确定了农民用来构建其有机过渡的三种流行叙事:环境主义、农场家庭遗产和经济因素,此外还有四种未经测试的宗教叙事。这项研究试图更好地理解这些不同的叙述是如何构建粮食农民从传统生产系统向认证有机生产系统过渡的思维过程的。我们与农民共同创作了关于有机生产的叙事,共有四段与文献一致:农场家庭遗产、经济价值观、环境价值观、基督教和伊甸园。然后,我们向传统的、转型期的和认证的印第安纳州有机谷物农民邮寄了一份论文调查,以测试这些不同的叙述是如何推动有机生产的。我们发现,围绕有机生产最普遍的说法是农场家庭遗产,这一点特别引起了中型农民的共鸣。我们还发现,宗教管理叙事与大量有机和混合实践的农民产生了共鸣,这可能是由于样本中的阿米什农民。这些结果阐明了叙事和相关价值观在有机实践使用中的作用,并可以为农业专业人员的有机努力提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems (formerly American Journal of Alternative Agriculture) is a multi-disciplinary journal which focuses on the science that underpins economically, environmentally, and socially sustainable approaches to agriculture and food production. The journal publishes original research and review articles on the economic, ecological, and environmental impacts of agriculture; the effective use of renewable resources and biodiversity in agro-ecosystems; and the technological and sociological implications of sustainable food systems. It also contains a discussion forum, which presents lively discussions on new and provocative topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信