Making What Present Again? A Critique of Argumentative Judicial Representation

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2021-06-25 DOI:10.1017/cjlj.2021.6

Donald Bello Hutt

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Courts do many good things. Judges carefully consider individual claims and arguments,1 and contrast them against the law in light of evidence. Their decisions are argued for, are public, and can be contested in form and content in different hierarchical stages. Additionally, and among other things, these practices are said to contribute to the will-formation of the public sphere and improve the quality of the legislative process.2

查看原文本刊更多论文

再次制作什么礼物？辩论性司法代表批评

法院做了很多好事。法官仔细考虑个人主张和论点，1并根据证据将其与法律进行对比。他们的决定是有争议的，是公开的，可以在不同的等级阶段在形式和内容上提出质疑。此外，据说这些做法有助于形成公共领域的意愿，并提高立法程序的质量。2

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence LAW-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence serves as a forum for special and general jurisprudence and legal philosophy. It publishes articles that address the nature of law, that engage in philosophical analysis or criticism of legal doctrine, that examine the form and nature of legal or judicial reasoning, that investigate issues concerning the ethical aspects of legal practice, and that study (from a philosophical perspective) concrete legal issues facing contemporary society. The journal does not use case notes, nor does it publish articles focussing on issues particular to the laws of a single nation. The Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence is published on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Western University.