Brexit and Public Procurement: Transitioning into the Void?

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
P. Telles, Albert Sánchez Graells
{"title":"Brexit and Public Procurement: Transitioning into the Void?","authors":"P. Telles, Albert Sánchez Graells","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3166056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 29 March 2017, the UK notified its intention of leaving the EU. This activated the two-year disconnection period foreseen in art.50 TEU, thus resulting in a default Brexit at the end of March 2019. The firming up of a draft agreement on a transition period to run until 31 December 2020 could provide a longer timescale for the Brexit disconnection, as well as some clarity on the process of disentanglement of the UK’s and EU’s legal systems. The draft transition agreement of 19 March 2018, updated on 19 June 2018 and still under negotiation at the time of writing, provides explicit rules on public procurement bound to regulate “internal” procurement trade between the UK and the EU for a period of over 15 months. However, the uncertainty concerning the future EU–UK relationship remains, and the draft agreement does not provide any indication on the likely legal architecture for future EU–UK trade, including through public procurement. The draft agreement has thus not suppressed the risk of a “cliffedge” disconnection post-Brexit, but rather only deferred it. The transition is currently not into an alternative system of procurement regulation, but rather into the void. There have also been very limited developments concerning the UK’s and EU’s repositioning within the World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement (WTO GPA), which creates additional legal uncertainty from the perspective of “external” trade in procurement markets due to the absence of a “WTO rules” default applicable to public procurement. Against the backdrop of this legal uncertainty, this article critically assesses the implications of the 2018 draft transition agreement, both for the re-regulation of “internal” EU–UK procurement, and for the repositioning of both the EU and the UK within the WTO GPA, as the basis for their “external” procurement trade with third countries. The article concludes that it is in both the UK’s and the EU’s interest to reach a future EU–UK FTA that ensures continued collaboration and crystallises current compliance with EU rules, and to build on it to reach a jointly negotiated solution vis-a-vis the rest of WTO GPA parties. The article constitutes a detailed case study that provides insights applicable to other areas of Brexit-related trade reregulation.","PeriodicalId":45752,"journal":{"name":"European Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3166056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 29 March 2017, the UK notified its intention of leaving the EU. This activated the two-year disconnection period foreseen in art.50 TEU, thus resulting in a default Brexit at the end of March 2019. The firming up of a draft agreement on a transition period to run until 31 December 2020 could provide a longer timescale for the Brexit disconnection, as well as some clarity on the process of disentanglement of the UK’s and EU’s legal systems. The draft transition agreement of 19 March 2018, updated on 19 June 2018 and still under negotiation at the time of writing, provides explicit rules on public procurement bound to regulate “internal” procurement trade between the UK and the EU for a period of over 15 months. However, the uncertainty concerning the future EU–UK relationship remains, and the draft agreement does not provide any indication on the likely legal architecture for future EU–UK trade, including through public procurement. The draft agreement has thus not suppressed the risk of a “cliffedge” disconnection post-Brexit, but rather only deferred it. The transition is currently not into an alternative system of procurement regulation, but rather into the void. There have also been very limited developments concerning the UK’s and EU’s repositioning within the World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement (WTO GPA), which creates additional legal uncertainty from the perspective of “external” trade in procurement markets due to the absence of a “WTO rules” default applicable to public procurement. Against the backdrop of this legal uncertainty, this article critically assesses the implications of the 2018 draft transition agreement, both for the re-regulation of “internal” EU–UK procurement, and for the repositioning of both the EU and the UK within the WTO GPA, as the basis for their “external” procurement trade with third countries. The article concludes that it is in both the UK’s and the EU’s interest to reach a future EU–UK FTA that ensures continued collaboration and crystallises current compliance with EU rules, and to build on it to reach a jointly negotiated solution vis-a-vis the rest of WTO GPA parties. The article constitutes a detailed case study that provides insights applicable to other areas of Brexit-related trade reregulation.
英国脱欧与公共采购:向空白过渡?
2017年3月29日,英国宣布退出欧盟。这就启动了第50条所预见的两年断网期TEU,从而导致2019年3月底违约脱欧。确定一项过渡期至2020年12月31日的协议草案,可能会为英国脱欧提供更长的时间,并在一定程度上明确英国和欧盟法律体系的分离过程。2018年3月19日的过渡协议草案,于2018年6月19日更新,在撰写本文时仍在谈判中,为公共采购提供了明确的规则,以规范英国和欧盟之间的“内部”采购贸易,为期超过15个月。然而,未来欧盟-英国关系的不确定性仍然存在,协议草案没有提供任何关于未来欧盟-英国贸易可能的法律架构的指示,包括通过公共采购。因此,该协议草案并没有抑制英国脱欧后出现“断崖式”脱欧的风险,而只是推迟了这种风险。目前的过渡不是进入另一种采购监管制度,而是进入空白。关于英国和欧盟在世界贸易组织政府采购协定(WTO GPA)中的重新定位,也有非常有限的进展,由于缺乏适用于公共采购的“WTO规则”默认值,从采购市场“外部”贸易的角度来看,这造成了额外的法律不确定性。在这种法律不确定性的背景下,本文批判性地评估了2018年过渡协议草案的影响,无论是对“内部”欧盟-英国采购的重新监管,还是对欧盟和英国在WTO GPA中的重新定位,作为他们与第三国“外部”采购贸易的基础。文章的结论是,达成未来的欧盟-英国自由贸易协定,确保继续合作,明确当前对欧盟规则的遵守,并以此为基础,与其他WTO GPA缔约方达成联合谈判解决方案,符合英国和欧盟的利益。这篇文章构成了一个详细的案例研究,提供了适用于英国脱欧相关贸易监管其他领域的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信