Ruination and Redemption in Billy Wilder's Romantic Comedies

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Janet McCracken
{"title":"Ruination and Redemption in Billy Wilder's Romantic Comedies","authors":"Janet McCracken","doi":"10.1353/flm.2023.a903044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"n his acceptance speech for the Oscar for Best Foreign Language film of 1992, Fernando Trueba stated, \"I would like to believe in God in order to thank him. But I just believe in Billy Wilder...so thank you, Mr. Wilder.” To directors, Billy Wilder, who would die in 2002, was alive and well in every sense. When French filmmaker Michel Hazanavicius accepted his Oscar for Best Picture for The Artist (2011), he thanked \"Billy Wilder...Billy Wilder, and...Billy Wilder.” Director Stephen Frears, no slouch himself, is currently in post-production of a film about the Hollywood icon, starring Christoph Waltz. Directors get books written about them, and the volumes written about Wilder are too numerous to review, but not often do directors get movies made about them. Wilder, however, was a rare sort: a director’s director, the kind of artist who, long after death, keeps teaching the other directors, and the scholars keep talking. In this company, then, it’s prudent for me to keep my claim modest, demonstrable, and useful. My claim bears some resemblance to what Andrew Sarris once wrote: that the “apparent cynicism” in Billy Wilder “was the only way he could make his raging romanticism palatable’” (McBride, 273). Conversely, Neil Sinyard and Adrian Turner “drew attention to Wilder’s gentler, more romantic side...[challenging] the accusations of cynicism and bad taste” (Armstrong, 2). But that’s the point: Wilder would never sacrifice comedic or romantic force in his films, but neither would he sacrifice tragic or agonistic elements that drove the otherwise happy endings toward existential choice.","PeriodicalId":53571,"journal":{"name":"Film and History","volume":"53 1","pages":"18 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Film and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/flm.2023.a903044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

n his acceptance speech for the Oscar for Best Foreign Language film of 1992, Fernando Trueba stated, "I would like to believe in God in order to thank him. But I just believe in Billy Wilder...so thank you, Mr. Wilder.” To directors, Billy Wilder, who would die in 2002, was alive and well in every sense. When French filmmaker Michel Hazanavicius accepted his Oscar for Best Picture for The Artist (2011), he thanked "Billy Wilder...Billy Wilder, and...Billy Wilder.” Director Stephen Frears, no slouch himself, is currently in post-production of a film about the Hollywood icon, starring Christoph Waltz. Directors get books written about them, and the volumes written about Wilder are too numerous to review, but not often do directors get movies made about them. Wilder, however, was a rare sort: a director’s director, the kind of artist who, long after death, keeps teaching the other directors, and the scholars keep talking. In this company, then, it’s prudent for me to keep my claim modest, demonstrable, and useful. My claim bears some resemblance to what Andrew Sarris once wrote: that the “apparent cynicism” in Billy Wilder “was the only way he could make his raging romanticism palatable’” (McBride, 273). Conversely, Neil Sinyard and Adrian Turner “drew attention to Wilder’s gentler, more romantic side...[challenging] the accusations of cynicism and bad taste” (Armstrong, 2). But that’s the point: Wilder would never sacrifice comedic or romantic force in his films, but neither would he sacrifice tragic or agonistic elements that drove the otherwise happy endings toward existential choice.
比利·怀尔德浪漫喜剧的毁灭与救赎
费尔南多·特鲁巴在1992年奥斯卡最佳外语片奖的获奖感言中说:“为了感谢上帝,我愿意相信上帝。但我相信比利·怀尔德……谢谢你,怀尔德先生。”对于导演们来说,2002年去世的比利·怀尔德(Billy Wilder)在任何意义上都活得很好。当法国导演米歇尔·哈扎纳维修斯凭借《艺术家》(2011)获得奥斯卡最佳影片奖时,他感谢“比利·怀尔德……比利·怀尔德,还有……比利怀尔德。”导演斯蒂芬·弗雷斯本人也毫不懈怠,目前正在制作一部关于这位好莱坞偶像的电影,由克里斯托弗·瓦尔兹主演。导演们会写关于他们的书,关于怀尔德的书太多了,无法评论,但导演们很少会被拍成电影。然而,怀尔德是一种罕见的类型:导演中的导演,那种在死后很久还在教导其他导演,学者们还在继续讨论的艺术家。因此,在这家公司,谨慎的做法是让我的要求保持适度、可论证且有用。我的说法与安德鲁·萨里斯曾经写过的有一些相似之处:比利·怀尔德身上“明显的玩世不恭”“是他能让他愤怒的浪漫主义变得令人愉快的唯一方式”(麦克布莱德,273)。相反,尼尔·辛亚德和阿德里安·特纳“让人们注意到怀尔德温柔、浪漫的一面……[挑战]愤世嫉俗和品味低劣的指责”(阿姆斯特朗,2)。但这就是重点:怀尔德永远不会牺牲他电影中的喜剧或浪漫力量,但他也不会牺牲悲剧或激烈的元素,这些元素推动了原本幸福的结局走向存在主义的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Film and History
Film and History Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信