Physiotherapy, Local Acupuncture, and Auricular Acupuncture for Frozen Shoulder

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERONTOLOGY
M. Hollisaz, Amidoddin Khatibi Aghda, M. Asheghan, A. Amanollahi, S. E. Hashemi
{"title":"Physiotherapy, Local Acupuncture, and Auricular Acupuncture for Frozen Shoulder","authors":"M. Hollisaz, Amidoddin Khatibi Aghda, M. Asheghan, A. Amanollahi, S. E. Hashemi","doi":"10.1097/TGR.0000000000000380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare local acupuncture and auricular acupuncture with physiotherapy in the treatment of frozen shoulder. Methods: A randomized clinical trial with 3 parallel groups in an outpatient clinic was conducted at a university hospital. In total, 116 participants with frozen shoulder were randomly allocated to 3 groups and underwent physiotherapy or local acupuncture or auricular acupuncture. Shoulder active and passive ranges of motion were assessed, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index questionnaire was used to assess pain and disability before and after the treatments. Results: Active and passive ranges of motion were best improved by physiotherapy in abduction and flexion (all P < .001). Passive external rotation was best increased after physiotherapy (P = .030). For active external and internal rotation, and also for passive internal rotation, there were no significant differences among the treatments. Pain reduction was more successful with acupuncture, especially with auricular acupuncture (P < .001). Auricular acupuncture was more effective in improving patients' functional abilities (P < .001). None of the participants reported any side effects resulting from the treatments. Conclusion: Acupuncture, particularly auricular acupuncture, is more effective in relieving pain and decreasing disability than physiotherapy. All the interventions were beneficial in improving range of motion.","PeriodicalId":45972,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation","volume":"39 1","pages":"24 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TGR.0000000000000380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare local acupuncture and auricular acupuncture with physiotherapy in the treatment of frozen shoulder. Methods: A randomized clinical trial with 3 parallel groups in an outpatient clinic was conducted at a university hospital. In total, 116 participants with frozen shoulder were randomly allocated to 3 groups and underwent physiotherapy or local acupuncture or auricular acupuncture. Shoulder active and passive ranges of motion were assessed, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index questionnaire was used to assess pain and disability before and after the treatments. Results: Active and passive ranges of motion were best improved by physiotherapy in abduction and flexion (all P < .001). Passive external rotation was best increased after physiotherapy (P = .030). For active external and internal rotation, and also for passive internal rotation, there were no significant differences among the treatments. Pain reduction was more successful with acupuncture, especially with auricular acupuncture (P < .001). Auricular acupuncture was more effective in improving patients' functional abilities (P < .001). None of the participants reported any side effects resulting from the treatments. Conclusion: Acupuncture, particularly auricular acupuncture, is more effective in relieving pain and decreasing disability than physiotherapy. All the interventions were beneficial in improving range of motion.
物理疗法、局部针灸和耳针治疗肩周炎
目的:比较局部针刺、耳针与物理疗法治疗肩周炎的疗效。方法:在某大学附属医院门诊进行3组随机对照临床试验。116例肩周炎患者随机分为3组,分别接受物理治疗、局部针刺或耳针治疗。评估患者肩关节主动和被动活动度,并采用肩部疼痛和残疾指数问卷评估治疗前后的疼痛和残疾情况。结果:物理治疗对外展和屈曲的主动和被动活动度的改善效果最好(P < 0.001)。被动外旋在物理治疗后效果最好(P = 0.030)。对于主动外旋和内旋,以及被动内旋,治疗间无显著差异。针刺减轻疼痛更成功,尤其是耳针(P < 0.001)。耳针在改善患者功能能力方面更有效(P < 0.001)。没有参与者报告治疗产生任何副作用。结论:针刺尤其是耳针在缓解疼痛和减少残疾方面比物理治疗更有效。所有干预措施均有利于改善活动度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, (TGR) is a peer-reviewed journal that presents clinical, basic, and applied research, as well as theoretic information, consolidated into a clinically relevant format and provides a resource for the healthcare professional practicing in the area of geriatric rehabilitation. TGR provides useful, treatment-related information written by and for specialists in all aspects of geriatric care. Each issue focuses on a specific topic, providing dependable hands-on tips and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信