Application of Nursing Risk Management in Nursing of Severe Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

Jing Chen, Rongting Liu, Xue Wu, Zhi-hui Zhu, He Rong, Fengdan Yang, Shihong Deng
{"title":"Application of Nursing Risk Management in Nursing of Severe Peptic Ulcer Bleeding","authors":"Jing Chen, Rongting Liu, Xue Wu, Zhi-hui Zhu, He Rong, Fengdan Yang, Shihong Deng","doi":"10.4236/ym.2021.53021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess and compare the clinical application value of nursing risk management in the diagnosis and treatment of severe peptic ulcer bleeding. Methods: A total of 70 patients with severe peptic ulcer bleeding were selected as the research objects, randomly divided into observation group and control group, 35 cases for each. The nursing risk management and conventional nursing management were implemented for the two groups, respectively. The success rate of hemostasis, average length of stay, cure rate, complication rate, dyspnea rate, nursing dispute rate, SAS score, and SDS score were compared between the two groups. Patients’ satisfaction with nursing quality was also compared. Results: After the implementation of two different nursing management methods, all the above-mentioned metrics were better in the observation group than in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05). Conclusion: The application of nursing risk management in the nursing intervention process of patients with severe peptic ulcer bleeding can effectively reduce the probability of nursing risk events, increase the cure rate, shorten the patient’s hospital stay, but also improve the patients’ psychological state and increase the patient’s satisfaction with nursing quality, which is worth clinical promotion.","PeriodicalId":57748,"journal":{"name":"长江医药(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"长江医药(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ym.2021.53021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To assess and compare the clinical application value of nursing risk management in the diagnosis and treatment of severe peptic ulcer bleeding. Methods: A total of 70 patients with severe peptic ulcer bleeding were selected as the research objects, randomly divided into observation group and control group, 35 cases for each. The nursing risk management and conventional nursing management were implemented for the two groups, respectively. The success rate of hemostasis, average length of stay, cure rate, complication rate, dyspnea rate, nursing dispute rate, SAS score, and SDS score were compared between the two groups. Patients’ satisfaction with nursing quality was also compared. Results: After the implementation of two different nursing management methods, all the above-mentioned metrics were better in the observation group than in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05). Conclusion: The application of nursing risk management in the nursing intervention process of patients with severe peptic ulcer bleeding can effectively reduce the probability of nursing risk events, increase the cure rate, shorten the patient’s hospital stay, but also improve the patients’ psychological state and increase the patient’s satisfaction with nursing quality, which is worth clinical promotion.
护理风险管理在重症消化性溃疡出血护理中的应用
目的:评价和比较护理风险管理在严重消化性溃疡出血诊治中的临床应用价值。方法:选择70例严重消化性溃疡出血患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组35例。两组分别实施护理风险管理和常规护理管理。比较两组止血成功率、平均住院时间、治愈率、并发症发生率、呼吸困难率、护理纠纷率、SAS评分、SDS评分。并比较患者对护理质量的满意度。结果:两种不同的护理管理方法实施后,观察组上述各项指标均优于对照组,结论:将护理风险管理应用于严重消化性溃疡出血患者的护理干预过程中,可以有效降低护理风险事件发生的概率,提高治愈率,缩短患者住院时间,还能改善患者的心理状态,提高患者对护理质量的满意度,值得临床推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信