{"title":"IDEALISM IN MUSEUM","authors":"E. Klekot","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extensive volume edited by Robert R.\nJanes and Richard Sandell titled Museum Activism is composed\nof papers by over 50 authors. They are in majority\ncase studies, with examples from most varied institutions.\nMuseum activism is the opposite to museum social alienation;\nin this respect, the first definitely draws from the\nmany-years’ experience of New Museology and participatory\nmuseum. Museum activism advocates are negative\nabout the commercial populism and the success measured\nby turnout only, and not that measured exclusively by the\ndifferentiation of the museum offer and its accessibility\nto minority and marginalized groups. According to the\nEditors, contemporary museums are more morally obliged\nto engage in social activism, since in the times of a radical\ndrop of social trust worldwide, museums still constitute\none of the social institutions considered as trustworthy.\nMany of the actions described in the book concern the\nsphere of museum accessibility broadly speaking, both in\nthe sense of physical access and possibility to participate\nin the programme, and barriers of social nature. Another\nsphere of museum activism is made up of curatorial practices.\nThe texts point to many dimensions of activist curatorial\npractices which, however, first of all become the\nspace for questioning the myth about museum’s neutrality\nin many respects: the colonial collection genesis, attitude\ntowards climate, narratives constructing national identity,\nor finally the issue of the presence of curator’s voice in an\nexhibition. In many of the papers the role of museums in\nthe context of the responsibility for the climate, of raising\nsocial awareness, of constructing a new narrative on the\nrelation between man and the world, as well as the necessity\nto revise one’s own praxis are reiterated.\n\n","PeriodicalId":36577,"journal":{"name":"Muzealnictwo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muzealnictwo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The extensive volume edited by Robert R.
Janes and Richard Sandell titled Museum Activism is composed
of papers by over 50 authors. They are in majority
case studies, with examples from most varied institutions.
Museum activism is the opposite to museum social alienation;
in this respect, the first definitely draws from the
many-years’ experience of New Museology and participatory
museum. Museum activism advocates are negative
about the commercial populism and the success measured
by turnout only, and not that measured exclusively by the
differentiation of the museum offer and its accessibility
to minority and marginalized groups. According to the
Editors, contemporary museums are more morally obliged
to engage in social activism, since in the times of a radical
drop of social trust worldwide, museums still constitute
one of the social institutions considered as trustworthy.
Many of the actions described in the book concern the
sphere of museum accessibility broadly speaking, both in
the sense of physical access and possibility to participate
in the programme, and barriers of social nature. Another
sphere of museum activism is made up of curatorial practices.
The texts point to many dimensions of activist curatorial
practices which, however, first of all become the
space for questioning the myth about museum’s neutrality
in many respects: the colonial collection genesis, attitude
towards climate, narratives constructing national identity,
or finally the issue of the presence of curator’s voice in an
exhibition. In many of the papers the role of museums in
the context of the responsibility for the climate, of raising
social awareness, of constructing a new narrative on the
relation between man and the world, as well as the necessity
to revise one’s own praxis are reiterated.