IDEALISM IN MUSEUM

Q3 Arts and Humanities
E. Klekot
{"title":"IDEALISM IN MUSEUM","authors":"E. Klekot","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extensive volume edited by Robert R.\nJanes and Richard Sandell titled Museum Activism is composed\nof papers by over 50 authors. They are in majority\ncase studies, with examples from most varied institutions.\nMuseum activism is the opposite to museum social alienation;\nin this respect, the first definitely draws from the\nmany-years’ experience of New Museology and participatory\nmuseum. Museum activism advocates are negative\nabout the commercial populism and the success measured\nby turnout only, and not that measured exclusively by the\ndifferentiation of the museum offer and its accessibility\nto minority and marginalized groups. According to the\nEditors, contemporary museums are more morally obliged\nto engage in social activism, since in the times of a radical\ndrop of social trust worldwide, museums still constitute\none of the social institutions considered as trustworthy.\nMany of the actions described in the book concern the\nsphere of museum accessibility broadly speaking, both in\nthe sense of physical access and possibility to participate\nin the programme, and barriers of social nature. Another\nsphere of museum activism is made up of curatorial practices.\nThe texts point to many dimensions of activist curatorial\npractices which, however, first of all become the\nspace for questioning the myth about museum’s neutrality\nin many respects: the colonial collection genesis, attitude\ntowards climate, narratives constructing national identity,\nor finally the issue of the presence of curator’s voice in an\nexhibition. In many of the papers the role of museums in\nthe context of the responsibility for the climate, of raising\nsocial awareness, of constructing a new narrative on the\nrelation between man and the world, as well as the necessity\nto revise one’s own praxis are reiterated.\n\n","PeriodicalId":36577,"journal":{"name":"Muzealnictwo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muzealnictwo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The extensive volume edited by Robert R. Janes and Richard Sandell titled Museum Activism is composed of papers by over 50 authors. They are in majority case studies, with examples from most varied institutions. Museum activism is the opposite to museum social alienation; in this respect, the first definitely draws from the many-years’ experience of New Museology and participatory museum. Museum activism advocates are negative about the commercial populism and the success measured by turnout only, and not that measured exclusively by the differentiation of the museum offer and its accessibility to minority and marginalized groups. According to the Editors, contemporary museums are more morally obliged to engage in social activism, since in the times of a radical drop of social trust worldwide, museums still constitute one of the social institutions considered as trustworthy. Many of the actions described in the book concern the sphere of museum accessibility broadly speaking, both in the sense of physical access and possibility to participate in the programme, and barriers of social nature. Another sphere of museum activism is made up of curatorial practices. The texts point to many dimensions of activist curatorial practices which, however, first of all become the space for questioning the myth about museum’s neutrality in many respects: the colonial collection genesis, attitude towards climate, narratives constructing national identity, or finally the issue of the presence of curator’s voice in an exhibition. In many of the papers the role of museums in the context of the responsibility for the climate, of raising social awareness, of constructing a new narrative on the relation between man and the world, as well as the necessity to revise one’s own praxis are reiterated.
博物馆中的理想主义
这本由罗伯特·r·詹姆斯和理查德·桑德尔编辑的名为《博物馆行动主义》的书由50多位作者的论文组成。它们主要是案例研究,有来自大多数不同机构的例子。博物馆行动主义与博物馆社会异化是对立的,在这一点上,前者无疑是汲取了他们多年来在新博物馆学和参与式博物馆方面的经验。博物馆激进主义的倡导者对商业民粹主义和仅以投票率衡量的成功持否定态度,而不是仅仅通过博物馆提供的差异化以及对少数民族和边缘群体的可及性来衡量。编者认为,当代博物馆在道德上更有义务参与社会活动,因为在世界范围内社会信任度急剧下降的时代,博物馆仍然是被认为值得信赖的社会机构之一。书中描述的许多行动广泛地涉及博物馆的可达性领域,包括物理访问和参与项目的可能性,以及社会性质的障碍。博物馆行动主义的另一个领域是由策展实践组成的。这些文本指出了积极策展实践的许多维度,然而,首先成为质疑博物馆在许多方面的中立性神话的空间:殖民收藏起源,对气候的态度,构建国家身份的叙事,或者最后是策展人在展览中的声音存在的问题。在许多论文中,博物馆在气候责任、提高社会意识、构建人与世界关系的新叙事以及修改自己实践的必要性等方面的作用都得到了重申。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Muzealnictwo
Muzealnictwo Arts and Humanities-Museology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信