Comparative study of two different surgical methods for the treatment of Garden III and IV femoral neck fractures in young adults

Dong Zhang, Aixi Yu, Guo-rong Yu, S. Tao, Zheng-yu Pan, Baiwen Qi, Weidong Xiao, Kai Deng
{"title":"Comparative study of two different surgical methods for the treatment of Garden III and IV femoral neck fractures in young adults","authors":"Dong Zhang, Aixi Yu, Guo-rong Yu, S. Tao, Zheng-yu Pan, Baiwen Qi, Weidong Xiao, Kai Deng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-2036.2018.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare internal fixation with hallow compression screws combined vascularized bone graft (observation group) with only three hallow compression screws (control group) in young patients’ Garden III and IV femoral neck fractures. \n \n \nMethods \nThe patients with femoral neck fracture were treated from January, 2004 to December, 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 417 displaced femoral neck fractures in young and middleaged patients were long term followed-up. One hundred and thirty-seven patients were underwent open reduction and internal fixation with 3 hallow compression screws combined with a greater trochanter bone graft supported by the profound branch of medial circumflex femoral artery; 280 patients were treated by closed reduction with 3 hallow compression screws. \n \n \nResults \nPatients had been followed-up for 5-12 years. At the last follow-up point, the Harris score of flap in observation group(93.68±5.12) were higher than that in control group(92.53±6.12), while it was no statistical difference(P>0.05). It was 0.7% of nonunion incidence rate in the observation group, and incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head was 6.6%, and incidence of femoral neck shortening was 8.8%. In the control group, incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head was 14.6%, nonunion incidence rate was 4.6%, and incidence of femoral neck shortening was 22.5%. The differences between two groups was statistically significance(P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nThe open reduction and internal fixation which is hallow compression screws in combination with a greater trochanter bone graft supported by the profound branch of medial circumflex femoral artery is an optimal treatment for young adults with Garden III and IV femoral neck fractures. \n \n \nKey words: \nFemoral neck fracture; Garden type; Internal fixation; Bone graft; Transposition","PeriodicalId":60782,"journal":{"name":"中华显微外科杂志","volume":"41 1","pages":"428-432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华显微外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-2036.2018.05.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare internal fixation with hallow compression screws combined vascularized bone graft (observation group) with only three hallow compression screws (control group) in young patients’ Garden III and IV femoral neck fractures. Methods The patients with femoral neck fracture were treated from January, 2004 to December, 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 417 displaced femoral neck fractures in young and middleaged patients were long term followed-up. One hundred and thirty-seven patients were underwent open reduction and internal fixation with 3 hallow compression screws combined with a greater trochanter bone graft supported by the profound branch of medial circumflex femoral artery; 280 patients were treated by closed reduction with 3 hallow compression screws. Results Patients had been followed-up for 5-12 years. At the last follow-up point, the Harris score of flap in observation group(93.68±5.12) were higher than that in control group(92.53±6.12), while it was no statistical difference(P>0.05). It was 0.7% of nonunion incidence rate in the observation group, and incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head was 6.6%, and incidence of femoral neck shortening was 8.8%. In the control group, incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head was 14.6%, nonunion incidence rate was 4.6%, and incidence of femoral neck shortening was 22.5%. The differences between two groups was statistically significance(P<0.05). Conclusion The open reduction and internal fixation which is hallow compression screws in combination with a greater trochanter bone graft supported by the profound branch of medial circumflex femoral artery is an optimal treatment for young adults with Garden III and IV femoral neck fractures. Key words: Femoral neck fracture; Garden type; Internal fixation; Bone graft; Transposition
两种不同手术方式治疗青壮年Garden III型和IV型股骨颈骨折的比较研究
目的比较空心加压螺钉联合血管化骨移植内固定(观察组)与单纯三枚空心加压螺钉内固定(对照组)治疗年轻GardenⅢ、Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折的疗效。方法对2004年1月至2013年12月收治的股骨颈骨折患者进行回顾性分析。对417例中青年移位股骨颈骨折患者进行了长期随访。对137例患者进行了切开复位和3颗空心加压螺钉内固定,结合旋股内侧动脉深支支撑的大转子骨移植物;280例患者采用3枚空心加压螺钉闭合复位。结果随访5~12年。最后一次随访时,观察组皮瓣Harris评分(93.68±5.12)高于对照组(92.53±6.12),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),为观察组骨不连发生率的0.7%,股骨头缺血性坏死发生率为6.6%,股骨颈缩短发生率为8.8%,股骨头缺血性坏死发生率14.6%、骨不连发生率4.6%,股骨颈缩短发生率为22.5%,两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)IV股骨颈骨折。关键词:股骨颈骨折;花园式;内固定;骨移植;换位
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6448
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Microsurgery was established in 1978, the predecessor of which is Microsurgery. Chinese Journal of Microsurgery is now indexed by WPRIM, CNKI, Wanfang Data, CSCD, etc. The impact factor of the journal is 1.731 in 2017, ranking the third among all journal of comprehensive surgery. The journal covers clinical and basic studies in field of microsurgery. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信