You Cannot Improve What You Do Not Measure – The Gendered Dimensions of UN PKO Data

IF 2.3 2区社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.1080/17502977.2022.2031520

R. Nagel, K. Fin, Julia Maenza

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT UN peacekeeping operations have introduced new data-based systems such as the Situational Awareness Geospatial Enterprise (SAGE) and the Comprehensive Planning and Performance Assessment System (CPAS). Simultaneously, UN leadership has repeatedly made the case that more women in peacekeeping will make peacekeeping more effective. We argue and show that these initiatives while occurring concurrently have been separate and that there is a lack of gender mainstreaming in the data-based approaches. We contend that this has negative consequences: It produces incomplete data regarding threats and needs of local beneficiaries and peacekeepers, it impedes performance assessment, and it leaves inefficiencies unaddressed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

不衡量就无法改进——联合国维和行动数据的性别维度

联合国维和行动已经引入了新的基于数据的系统，如态势感知地理空间企业(SAGE)和综合规划和绩效评估系统(CPAS)。与此同时，联合国领导层一再强调，更多妇女参与维和行动将使维和行动更加有效。我们认为并表明，这些举措虽然同时发生，但却是分开的，并且在基于数据的方法中缺乏性别主流化。我们认为，这产生了负面影响:它产生了关于当地受益者和维和人员的威胁和需求的不完整数据，阻碍了绩效评估，并导致效率低下问题得不到解决。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding is a cross-disciplinary journal devoted to critical analysis of international intervention, focussing on interactions and practices that shape, influence and transform states and societies. In 21st century political practice, states and other actors increasingly strive to transplant what they see as normatively progressive political orders to other contexts. Accordingly, JISB focuses on the complex interconnections and mutually shaping interactions between donor and recipient communities within military, economic, social, or other interventional contexts, and welcomes perspectives on political life of, and beyond, European state-building processes. The journal brings together academics and practitioners from cross-disciplinary backgrounds, including international relations, political science, political economy, sociology, international law, social anthropology, geography, and regional studies. The editors are particularly interested in specific or comparative in-depth analyses of contemporary or historical interventions and state-building processes that are grounded in careful fieldwork and/or innovative methodologies. Multi or cross-disciplinary contributions and theoretically challenging pieces that broaden the study of intervention and state building to encompass processes of decision-making, or the complex interplay between actors on the ground, are especially encouraged.