Mental health mobile app use to manage psychological difficulties: an umbrella review

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Kiran Badesha, Sarah Wilde, David L. Dawson
{"title":"Mental health mobile app use to manage psychological difficulties: an umbrella review","authors":"Kiran Badesha, Sarah Wilde, David L. Dawson","doi":"10.1108/mhrj-02-2021-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nA rapid increase in global smartphone ownership and digital health technologies offers the potential for mobile phone applications (apps) to deliver mental health interventions. The purpose of this paper is to bring together evidence reporting on mental health mobile apps to gain an understanding of the quality of current evidence, the positive and adverse effects of apps and the mechanisms underlying such effects.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA systematic search was carried out across six databases, for any systematic reviews or meta-analyses conducted up to 2020. Review quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews.\n\n\nFindings\nAcross a total of 24 articles, a variety of clinical outcomes were assessed. Most compelling support was shown for apps targeting anxiety symptoms; some evidence favoured the use of apps for depression symptoms. Less evidence was available for the remaining clinical symptoms such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep disorders and substance use. Overall, there was limited evidence pertaining to adverse effects and change mechanisms and a lack of quality reporting across a large proportion of included reviews. The included reviews demonstrate the need for further robust research before apps are recommended clinically.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper makes a valuable contribution to the current status of research and reviews investigating mental health mobile apps. Recommendations are made for improved adherence to review guidelines and to ensure risk of bias is minimised.\n","PeriodicalId":45687,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Review Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-02-2021-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose A rapid increase in global smartphone ownership and digital health technologies offers the potential for mobile phone applications (apps) to deliver mental health interventions. The purpose of this paper is to bring together evidence reporting on mental health mobile apps to gain an understanding of the quality of current evidence, the positive and adverse effects of apps and the mechanisms underlying such effects. Design/methodology/approach A systematic search was carried out across six databases, for any systematic reviews or meta-analyses conducted up to 2020. Review quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews. Findings Across a total of 24 articles, a variety of clinical outcomes were assessed. Most compelling support was shown for apps targeting anxiety symptoms; some evidence favoured the use of apps for depression symptoms. Less evidence was available for the remaining clinical symptoms such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep disorders and substance use. Overall, there was limited evidence pertaining to adverse effects and change mechanisms and a lack of quality reporting across a large proportion of included reviews. The included reviews demonstrate the need for further robust research before apps are recommended clinically. Originality/value This paper makes a valuable contribution to the current status of research and reviews investigating mental health mobile apps. Recommendations are made for improved adherence to review guidelines and to ensure risk of bias is minimised.
使用心理健康移动应用程序来管理心理困难:概括性评论
目的全球智能手机拥有量和数字卫生技术的迅速增加,为移动电话应用程序提供心理健康干预措施提供了潜力。本文的目的是汇集有关心理健康移动应用程序的证据报告,以了解当前证据的质量、应用程序的积极和不利影响以及这些影响背后的机制。设计/方法/方法在6个数据库中进行了系统检索,以获取截至2020年的任何系统综述或元分析。采用多系统评价评价法评价评价质量。在总共24篇文章中,评估了各种临床结果。最令人信服的支持是针对焦虑症状的应用程序;一些证据支持使用应用程序治疗抑郁症状。关于其他临床症状,如双相情感障碍、精神分裂症、创伤后应激障碍、睡眠障碍和物质使用的证据较少。总的来说,关于不良影响和变化机制的证据有限,并且在大部分纳入的审查中缺乏质量报告。纳入的评论表明,在临床推荐应用程序之前,需要进一步进行强有力的研究。原创性/价值本文对研究心理健康移动应用程序的现状和评论做出了有价值的贡献。提出建议,以改进对审查指南的遵守,并确保将偏见风险降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信