Relationship for The Establishment of Local Regulations in the Job Creation Law

Watoni Noerdin
{"title":"Relationship for The Establishment of Local Regulations in the Job Creation Law","authors":"Watoni Noerdin","doi":"10.25041/aelr.v3i2.2749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The job creation law was born with the aim of opening the widest possible investment climate in Indonesia. But so far, investors still face obstacles in investing in the form of difficult regulations. This can be seerightjobn in the disharmony and lack of coordination between local regulations and central government regulations. Based on this, the problem arises how is the relationship for the establishment of local regulations in the job creation law?. The method used in this research is normative legal research with a qualitative approach method with a focus on regulations and related data to answer problems. It can be concluded that Article 174 of the job creation law adds rules regarding the relationship between the central and local governments, namely the authority of local governments as part of the presidential authority. Article 176 a quo also changes a number of local government authorities. For example, the licensing authority in Article 350 of Law 23/2014. In PP No 6/2021, Article 3 Implementation of Business Licensing in the Regions is carried out by the Central Government, Provincial Government, and City/Regency Goverment in accordance with their respective authorities based on the provisions of laws and regulations. From the licensing rules, it is not executive preview as a form of preventive supervision, but top-down control that dominates. This has the potential to eliminate local content and conditions based on regional interests.","PeriodicalId":52589,"journal":{"name":"Administrative and Environmental Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative and Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v3i2.2749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The job creation law was born with the aim of opening the widest possible investment climate in Indonesia. But so far, investors still face obstacles in investing in the form of difficult regulations. This can be seerightjobn in the disharmony and lack of coordination between local regulations and central government regulations. Based on this, the problem arises how is the relationship for the establishment of local regulations in the job creation law?. The method used in this research is normative legal research with a qualitative approach method with a focus on regulations and related data to answer problems. It can be concluded that Article 174 of the job creation law adds rules regarding the relationship between the central and local governments, namely the authority of local governments as part of the presidential authority. Article 176 a quo also changes a number of local government authorities. For example, the licensing authority in Article 350 of Law 23/2014. In PP No 6/2021, Article 3 Implementation of Business Licensing in the Regions is carried out by the Central Government, Provincial Government, and City/Regency Goverment in accordance with their respective authorities based on the provisions of laws and regulations. From the licensing rules, it is not executive preview as a form of preventive supervision, but top-down control that dominates. This has the potential to eliminate local content and conditions based on regional interests.
论创造就业法中地方性法规设置的关系
创造就业法的诞生旨在为印度尼西亚创造尽可能广泛的投资环境。但到目前为止,投资者在投资方面仍然面临着困难重重的监管形式的障碍。这可以预见到地方法规和中央政府法规之间的不协调和缺乏协调。基于此,问题产生了,地方性法规在创造就业法中的设立关系如何?。本研究采用的方法是规范性法律研究,采用定性方法,重点是法规和相关数据来回答问题。可以得出结论,《创造就业法》第174条增加了关于中央和地方政府之间关系的规则,即地方政府的权力是总统权力的一部分。第176条的现状也改变了一些地方政府当局。例如,第23/2014号法律第350条中的许可证颁发机构。在2021年6月的PP中,第3条在各地区实施营业执照由中央政府、省政府和市/自治区政府根据法律法规的规定,按照各自的权限执行。从许可规则来看,主导的不是作为预防性监督形式的行政预览,而是自上而下的控制。这有可能消除基于地区利益的当地内容和条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信