{"title":"Role of mean and variability change in changes in European annual and seasonal extreme precipitation events","authors":"R. R. Wood","doi":"10.5194/esd-14-797-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The frequency of precipitation extremes is set to change\nin response to a warming climate. Thereby, the change in\nextreme precipitation event occurrence is influenced by both a shift in the mean and a\nchange in variability. How large the individual contributions are from either of\nthem (mean or variability) to the change in precipitation extremes is\nlargely unknown. This is, however, relevant for a better understanding of how\nand why climate extremes change. For this study, two sets of forcing\nexperiments from the regional CRCM5 initial-condition large ensemble are\nused: a set of 50 members with historical and RCP8.5 forcing and a\n35-member (700-year) ensemble of pre-industrial natural forcing. The concept\nof the probability risk ratio is used to partition the change in extreme-event occurrence into contributions from a change in mean climate or a\nchange in variability. The results show that the contributions from a change\nin variability are in parts equally important to changes in the mean and\ncan even exceed them. The level of contributions shows high spatial\nvariation, which underlines the importance of regional processes for changes\nin extremes. While over Scandinavia or central Europe the mean influences the\nincrease in extremes more, the increase is driven by changes in\nvariability over France, the Iberian Peninsula, and the Mediterranean. For\nannual extremes, the differences between the ratios of contribution of mean\nand variability are smaller, while on seasonal scales the difference in\ncontributions becomes larger. In winter (DJF) the mean contributes more to\nan increase in extreme events, while in summer (JJA) the change in\nvariability drives the change in extremes. The level of temporal aggregation\n(3, 24, 72 h) has only a small influence on annual and winterly extremes,\nwhile in summer the contribution from variability can increase with longer\ndurations. The level of extremeness for the event definition generally\nincreases the role of variability. These results highlight the need for a\nbetter understanding of changes in climate variability to better understand\nthe mechanisms behind changes in climate extremes.\n","PeriodicalId":92775,"journal":{"name":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-797-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract. The frequency of precipitation extremes is set to change
in response to a warming climate. Thereby, the change in
extreme precipitation event occurrence is influenced by both a shift in the mean and a
change in variability. How large the individual contributions are from either of
them (mean or variability) to the change in precipitation extremes is
largely unknown. This is, however, relevant for a better understanding of how
and why climate extremes change. For this study, two sets of forcing
experiments from the regional CRCM5 initial-condition large ensemble are
used: a set of 50 members with historical and RCP8.5 forcing and a
35-member (700-year) ensemble of pre-industrial natural forcing. The concept
of the probability risk ratio is used to partition the change in extreme-event occurrence into contributions from a change in mean climate or a
change in variability. The results show that the contributions from a change
in variability are in parts equally important to changes in the mean and
can even exceed them. The level of contributions shows high spatial
variation, which underlines the importance of regional processes for changes
in extremes. While over Scandinavia or central Europe the mean influences the
increase in extremes more, the increase is driven by changes in
variability over France, the Iberian Peninsula, and the Mediterranean. For
annual extremes, the differences between the ratios of contribution of mean
and variability are smaller, while on seasonal scales the difference in
contributions becomes larger. In winter (DJF) the mean contributes more to
an increase in extreme events, while in summer (JJA) the change in
variability drives the change in extremes. The level of temporal aggregation
(3, 24, 72 h) has only a small influence on annual and winterly extremes,
while in summer the contribution from variability can increase with longer
durations. The level of extremeness for the event definition generally
increases the role of variability. These results highlight the need for a
better understanding of changes in climate variability to better understand
the mechanisms behind changes in climate extremes.