King Artaxerxes’ Aegean Policy

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Journal of Persianate Studies Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1163/18747167-12341304

Daniel Beckman

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Ernst Badian has argued that it would have been ideologically unacceptable for the great king of Persia to submit to negotiations with Athens and to bind himself by oath to the resulting Peace of Callias. This interpretation, however, is the result of the later Greek conception of the Peace of Callias as an Athenian victory over Persia, and the Peace of Antalcidas as a Persian humiliation of Greece. In this paper, I argue that the Achaemenid kings of Persia inherited notions of kinship, empire, and diplomacy from their Neo-Assyrian predecessors, and therefore saw treaties as an honorable and legitimate tool of empire.

查看原文本刊更多论文

阿尔塔薛西斯国王的爱琴海政策

恩斯特·巴迪安认为，伟大的波斯国王接受与雅典的谈判，并宣誓接受由此产生的卡利亚和约，这在意识形态上是不可接受的。然而，这种解释是后来希腊人将卡利亚和约视为雅典对波斯的胜利，而将安塔尔西达斯和约视为波斯对希腊的羞辱的结果。在本文中，我认为波斯的阿契美尼德国王从他们的新亚述前任那里继承了亲属关系、帝国和外交观念，因此将条约视为帝国的光荣和合法工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Persianate Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Publication of the Association for the Study of Persianate Societies. The journal publishes articles on the culture and civilization of the geographical area where Persian has historically been the dominant language or a major cultural force, encompassing Iran, Afghanistan and Tajikistan, as well as the Caucasus, Central Asia, the Indian Subcontinent, and parts of the former Ottoman Empire. Its focus on the linguistic, cultural and historical role and influence of Persian culture and Iranian civilization in this area is based on a recognition that knowledge flows from pre-existing facts but is also constructed and thus helps shape the present reality of the Persianate world.