Comparison of Three Single Leg Weightbearing Tasks with Statistical Parametric Mapping

N. Martonick, C. McGowan, Russell T. Baker, Lindsay W. Larkins, Jeff G. Seegmiller, Joshua P. Bailey
{"title":"Comparison of Three Single Leg Weightbearing Tasks with Statistical Parametric Mapping","authors":"N. Martonick, C. McGowan, Russell T. Baker, Lindsay W. Larkins, Jeff G. Seegmiller, Joshua P. Bailey","doi":"10.3390/biomechanics2040046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The single leg squat (SLS), forward step down (FSD), and lateral step down (LSD) are clinically reliable movement screens for identifying motion imbalances. The current understanding for the kinematic profiles of each task is limited to discrete time points such as peak knee flexion. However, analyses of the entire movement would better aid clinicians when selecting the appropriate task for rehabilitation or movement screen purposes. The current study used Statistical Parametric Mapping to ascertain differences in the kinematic waveforms for the entire duration of each task. The trunk, pelvis, hip, and knee were analyzed in the sagittal and frontal planes. Data for each variable and task were analyzed from 0–100% of the movement. Primary findings indicated that the FSD provoked a greater magnitude of knee abduction than the SLS and LSD from 26–66% of the movement. The SLS generated the greatest amounts of trunk, pelvic, and hip flexion for the entirety of the movement. The LSD elicited the least amount of ipsilateral trunk lean (90–100%). Thus, the FSD may be optimal for assessing frontal plane knee motion as a screen for injury risk, while the SLS has potential to place increased sagittal plane demand on the muscles of the hip.","PeriodicalId":72381,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics2040046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The single leg squat (SLS), forward step down (FSD), and lateral step down (LSD) are clinically reliable movement screens for identifying motion imbalances. The current understanding for the kinematic profiles of each task is limited to discrete time points such as peak knee flexion. However, analyses of the entire movement would better aid clinicians when selecting the appropriate task for rehabilitation or movement screen purposes. The current study used Statistical Parametric Mapping to ascertain differences in the kinematic waveforms for the entire duration of each task. The trunk, pelvis, hip, and knee were analyzed in the sagittal and frontal planes. Data for each variable and task were analyzed from 0–100% of the movement. Primary findings indicated that the FSD provoked a greater magnitude of knee abduction than the SLS and LSD from 26–66% of the movement. The SLS generated the greatest amounts of trunk, pelvic, and hip flexion for the entirety of the movement. The LSD elicited the least amount of ipsilateral trunk lean (90–100%). Thus, the FSD may be optimal for assessing frontal plane knee motion as a screen for injury risk, while the SLS has potential to place increased sagittal plane demand on the muscles of the hip.
三种单腿举重任务的统计参数映射比较
单腿深蹲(SLS)、向前下蹲(FSD)和横向下蹲(LSD)是临床上可靠的运动屏幕,用于识别运动失衡。目前对每项任务的运动学轮廓的理解仅限于离散的时间点,如峰值膝关节屈曲。然而,对整个运动的分析将更好地帮助临床医生选择合适的任务进行康复或运动筛查。目前的研究使用统计参数映射来确定每个任务的整个持续时间内运动学波形的差异。在矢状面和额平面上对躯干、骨盆、髋关节和膝关节进行分析。每个变量和任务的数据都是从0到100%的运动中进行分析的。初步研究结果表明,在26-66%的运动中,FSD比SLS和LSD引起更大程度的膝盖外展。SLS在整个运动过程中产生了最大量的躯干、骨盆和髋关节屈曲。LSD引起的同侧躯干倾斜最少(90-100%)。因此,FSD可能是评估正面膝关节运动作为损伤风险筛查的最佳方法,而SLS有可能增加髋关节肌肉的矢状面需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信