Local Adverse Drug Reactions In Ambulatory Asthma Patients Treated With Inhaled Corticosteroids: An Experience From A South Indian Teaching Hospital

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
A. Parthasarathi, Sachith Srinivas, Jayaraj Biligere Siddaiah, Padukudru Anand Mahesh
{"title":"Local Adverse Drug Reactions In Ambulatory Asthma Patients Treated With Inhaled Corticosteroids: An Experience From A South Indian Teaching Hospital","authors":"A. Parthasarathi, Sachith Srinivas, Jayaraj Biligere Siddaiah, Padukudru Anand Mahesh","doi":"10.2174/1573398x18666220501124708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nInhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have an essential and established role in the treatment of asthma. Both systemic and local adverse effects may accompany the long-term use of ICS. Systemic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of ICS are well established. However, there is a paucity of information on local ADRs, especially in the Indian population.\n\n\n\nTo determine the prevalence, severity, predictability, and preventability of local ADRs to ICS and their associated risk factors.\n\n\n\nPatients with asthma who need ICS were enrolled. Study patients were interviewed with open-ended questions to assess local ADRs to ICS at baseline and each follow-up visit, once a month for three months. Causality (Naranjo’s algorithm and WHO scale), severity (Hartwig SCf scale), predictability (based on the frequency of occurrence of ADR and history of drug exposure), and preventability (Schumock and Thornton criteria) of local ADRs were assessed. Bivariate analysis and subsequently multivariate logistic regression were used to identify the risk factors for local ADRs to ICS.\n\n\n\nA total of 243 patients (134 female) were included in the study. A total of 74 local ADRs were observed in 59 patients (prevalence 24.3%). The most common local ADRs were feeling of thirst (14.8%) followed by cough during inhalation (8.6%) and taste disturbance (4.5%). All ADRs were predictable and mild in severity. Preventability assessment found 85.1% of local ADRs as ‘probably preventable’. Two out of five patients who had ADR’s reduced or skipped doses because of the discomfort, despite their physician’s recommendation to continue their regular dose of ICS. Age >41 years, use of MDI without spacer, and use of budesonide were identified as the risk factors for developing ADRs to ICS.\n\n\n\nLocal ADRs to ICS were observed in approximately one in four patients with asthma. Two out of five patients who had ADRs reduced or skipped doses because of it. Strategies to prevent local ADRs to ICS should focus on patients aged >41 years, receiving budesonide, using MDI without a spacer, and is dose-dependent. We need to establish standards on the best practices for preventing ADRs, such as identifying the most suited device or ICS that is best tolerated by the individual patient, identifying the least ICS dose that maintains ideal asthma control.\n","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573398x18666220501124708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have an essential and established role in the treatment of asthma. Both systemic and local adverse effects may accompany the long-term use of ICS. Systemic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of ICS are well established. However, there is a paucity of information on local ADRs, especially in the Indian population. To determine the prevalence, severity, predictability, and preventability of local ADRs to ICS and their associated risk factors. Patients with asthma who need ICS were enrolled. Study patients were interviewed with open-ended questions to assess local ADRs to ICS at baseline and each follow-up visit, once a month for three months. Causality (Naranjo’s algorithm and WHO scale), severity (Hartwig SCf scale), predictability (based on the frequency of occurrence of ADR and history of drug exposure), and preventability (Schumock and Thornton criteria) of local ADRs were assessed. Bivariate analysis and subsequently multivariate logistic regression were used to identify the risk factors for local ADRs to ICS. A total of 243 patients (134 female) were included in the study. A total of 74 local ADRs were observed in 59 patients (prevalence 24.3%). The most common local ADRs were feeling of thirst (14.8%) followed by cough during inhalation (8.6%) and taste disturbance (4.5%). All ADRs were predictable and mild in severity. Preventability assessment found 85.1% of local ADRs as ‘probably preventable’. Two out of five patients who had ADR’s reduced or skipped doses because of the discomfort, despite their physician’s recommendation to continue their regular dose of ICS. Age >41 years, use of MDI without spacer, and use of budesonide were identified as the risk factors for developing ADRs to ICS. Local ADRs to ICS were observed in approximately one in four patients with asthma. Two out of five patients who had ADRs reduced or skipped doses because of it. Strategies to prevent local ADRs to ICS should focus on patients aged >41 years, receiving budesonide, using MDI without a spacer, and is dose-dependent. We need to establish standards on the best practices for preventing ADRs, such as identifying the most suited device or ICS that is best tolerated by the individual patient, identifying the least ICS dose that maintains ideal asthma control.
吸入皮质类固醇治疗非卧床哮喘患者的局部药物不良反应:来自南印度一家教学医院的经验
吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)在哮喘的治疗中具有重要和既定的作用。长期使用ICS可能会产生全身和局部不良反应。ICS的系统性药物不良反应(ADR)是公认的。然而,关于当地ADR的信息很少,尤其是在印度人口中。确定ICS局部ADR的发生率、严重程度、可预测性和可预防性及其相关风险因素。需要ICS的哮喘患者被纳入研究。研究患者接受了开放式问题访谈,以评估基线和每次随访时ICS的局部ADR,每月一次,为期三个月。对局部ADR的因果关系(Naranjo算法和世界卫生组织量表)、严重程度(Hartwig-SCf量表),可预测性(基于ADR发生频率和药物暴露史)和可预防性(Schumock和Thornton标准)进行评估。采用双变量分析和随后的多变量logistic回归来确定ICS局部ADR的危险因素。共有243名患者(134名女性)纳入研究。59例患者共观察到74例局部ADR(发生率24.3%)。最常见的局部ADR是口渴感(14.8%),其次是吸入时咳嗽(8.6%)和味觉障碍(4.5%)。所有ADR都是可预测的,严重程度较轻。可预防性评估发现85.1%的本地ADR“可能是可预防的”。五分之二的ADR患者因不适而减少或跳过剂量,尽管他们的医生建议继续常规剂量的ICS。年龄>41岁、使用不含间隔物的MDI和使用布地奈德被确定为发生ICS不良反应的危险因素。在大约四分之一的哮喘患者中观察到ICS的局部不良反应。五分之二的不良反应患者因此减少或跳过剂量。预防ICS局部不良反应的策略应侧重于年龄>41岁、接受布地奈德治疗、使用不带间隔物的MDI且具有剂量依赖性的患者。我们需要制定预防不良反应的最佳实践标准,例如确定最适合患者的设备或ICS,确定维持理想哮喘控制的最小ICS剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on respiratory diseases and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信