Methane Emission and Metabolic Status in Peak Lactating Dairy Cows and Their Assessment Via Methane Concentration Profile

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Dušan Bošnjaković, D. Kirovski, R. Prodanović, I. Vujanac, Sveta Arsić, Milica Stojković, Slavica Dražić, Sreten Nedić, Ljubomir Jovanović
{"title":"Methane Emission and Metabolic Status in Peak Lactating Dairy Cows and Their Assessment Via Methane Concentration Profile","authors":"Dušan Bošnjaković, D. Kirovski, R. Prodanović, I. Vujanac, Sveta Arsić, Milica Stojković, Slavica Dražić, Sreten Nedić, Ljubomir Jovanović","doi":"10.2478/acve-2023-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ruminant husbandry contributes to global methane (CH4) emissions and beside its negative impact on the environment, enteric CH4 emissions cause a loss of gross energy intake in cows. The study is aimed to estimate CH4 emission and metabolic status in dairy cows via the methane concentration profile as a tool for analyzing the CH4 production pattern. The study included eighteen cows whose enteric CH4 emission was measured during three consecutive days in three periods: 2 hours before (P1), 2–4 hours (P2) and 6–8 hours (P3) after the morning feeding. Based on CH4 enteric emissions, cows were divided into two groups (n=6, respectively): HM (average CH4 concentration: 5430.08 ± 365.92 ppm) and LM (average CH4 concentration: 1351.85 ± 205.20 ppm). Following CH4 measurement, on day 3, venous blood was sampled to determine the indicators of the metabolic status. HM cows had significantly higher average CH4 concentrations, maximum and average CH4 peak amplitude than LM cows in all measuring periods (P1-P3), while the number of CH4 peaks tended to be higher in HM than in LM cows in P2. There were no differences in the maximum and average CH4 peak width and average distance among two CH4 peaks between examined groups of cows. HM cows had significantly higher total protein concentrations and significantly lower total bilirubin and NEFA concentrations than LM cows. In conclusion, HM cows have a greater number of eructations and release more CH4 per eructation than LM cows, hence the differences in metabolic status are most likely related to the differences in their liver function.","PeriodicalId":55559,"journal":{"name":"Acta Veterinaria-Beograd","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Veterinaria-Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2023-0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Ruminant husbandry contributes to global methane (CH4) emissions and beside its negative impact on the environment, enteric CH4 emissions cause a loss of gross energy intake in cows. The study is aimed to estimate CH4 emission and metabolic status in dairy cows via the methane concentration profile as a tool for analyzing the CH4 production pattern. The study included eighteen cows whose enteric CH4 emission was measured during three consecutive days in three periods: 2 hours before (P1), 2–4 hours (P2) and 6–8 hours (P3) after the morning feeding. Based on CH4 enteric emissions, cows were divided into two groups (n=6, respectively): HM (average CH4 concentration: 5430.08 ± 365.92 ppm) and LM (average CH4 concentration: 1351.85 ± 205.20 ppm). Following CH4 measurement, on day 3, venous blood was sampled to determine the indicators of the metabolic status. HM cows had significantly higher average CH4 concentrations, maximum and average CH4 peak amplitude than LM cows in all measuring periods (P1-P3), while the number of CH4 peaks tended to be higher in HM than in LM cows in P2. There were no differences in the maximum and average CH4 peak width and average distance among two CH4 peaks between examined groups of cows. HM cows had significantly higher total protein concentrations and significantly lower total bilirubin and NEFA concentrations than LM cows. In conclusion, HM cows have a greater number of eructations and release more CH4 per eructation than LM cows, hence the differences in metabolic status are most likely related to the differences in their liver function.
泌乳高峰期奶牛的甲烷排放和代谢状况及其甲烷浓度分布评价
摘要反刍动物饲养导致了全球甲烷(CH4)排放,除了对环境的负面影响外,肠道CH4排放还会导致奶牛总能量摄入的损失。该研究旨在通过甲烷浓度剖面来估计奶牛的CH4排放和代谢状况,作为分析CH4生产模式的工具。该研究包括18头奶牛,它们在连续三天的三个时间段内测量了肠道CH4排放:晨饲前2小时(P1)、晨饲后2-4小时(P2)和晨饲后6-8小时(P3)。根据CH4肠道排放量,奶牛被分为两组(分别为n=6):HM(平均CH4浓度:5430.08±365.92 ppm)和LM(平均CH4含量:1351.85±205.20 ppm)。CH4测量后,在第3天,对静脉血进行采样,以确定代谢状态的指标。在所有测量期(P1-P3),HM奶牛的平均CH4浓度、最大和平均CH4峰值幅度均显著高于LM奶牛,而在P2,HM奶牛中的CH4峰值数量往往高于LM奶牛。在所检查的奶牛组之间,CH4峰的最大和平均宽度以及两个CH4峰之间的平均距离没有差异。HM奶牛的总蛋白浓度显著高于LM奶牛,总胆红素和NEFA浓度显著低于LM奶牛。总之,HM奶牛比LM奶牛有更多的爆发次数,每次爆发释放更多的CH4,因此代谢状态的差异很可能与它们的肝功能差异有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Veterinaria-Beograd
Acta Veterinaria-Beograd 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
33
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Acta Veterinaria is an open access, peer-reviewed scientific journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia, dedicated to the publication of original research articles, invited review articles, and to limited extent methodology articles and case reports. The journal considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信