Telephone calls and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-25 DOI:10.1177/1357633X221102257
Ana Marina Moreira, Roberta Marobin, Gustavo Monteiro Escott, Dimitris Varvaki Rados, Sandra Pinho Silveiro
{"title":"Telephone calls and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.","authors":"Ana Marina Moreira, Roberta Marobin, Gustavo Monteiro Escott, Dimitris Varvaki Rados, Sandra Pinho Silveiro","doi":"10.1177/1357633X221102257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In-depth and updated systematic reviews evaluating telephone calls in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) management are missing. This study aimed to assess the effect of this intervention on glycemic control in T2DM patients when compared with usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) on T2DM using Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and LILACS, up to March 2021. The Risk of Bias 2.0 (Rob 2.0) tool and GRADE were used for the quality evaluation. The intervention effect was estimated by the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). PROSPERO registry CRD42020204519.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3545 references were reviewed and 32 were included (8598 patients). Telephone calls, all approaching education, improved HbA1c by 0.33% [95% CI, -0.48% to -0.18%; I<sup>2</sup> = 78%; <i>p</i> < 0.0001] compared to usual care. A greater improvement was found when the intervention included pharmacologic modification (-0.82%, 95% CI, -1.42% to -0.22%; I<sup>2</sup> = 92%) and when it was applied by nurses (-0.53%, 95% CI, -0.86% to -0.2%; I<sup>2</sup> = 87%). Meta-regression showed no relationship between DM duration and HbA1c changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The telephone call intervention provided a benefit regarding T2DM glycemic control, especially if provided by nurses, or if associated with patient education and pharmacological treatment modification.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X221102257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: In-depth and updated systematic reviews evaluating telephone calls in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) management are missing. This study aimed to assess the effect of this intervention on glycemic control in T2DM patients when compared with usual care.

Methods: We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) on T2DM using Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and LILACS, up to March 2021. The Risk of Bias 2.0 (Rob 2.0) tool and GRADE were used for the quality evaluation. The intervention effect was estimated by the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). PROSPERO registry CRD42020204519.

Results: 3545 references were reviewed and 32 were included (8598 patients). Telephone calls, all approaching education, improved HbA1c by 0.33% [95% CI, -0.48% to -0.18%; I2 = 78%; p < 0.0001] compared to usual care. A greater improvement was found when the intervention included pharmacologic modification (-0.82%, 95% CI, -1.42% to -0.22%; I2 = 92%) and when it was applied by nurses (-0.53%, 95% CI, -0.86% to -0.2%; I2 = 87%). Meta-regression showed no relationship between DM duration and HbA1c changes.

Conclusion: The telephone call intervention provided a benefit regarding T2DM glycemic control, especially if provided by nurses, or if associated with patient education and pharmacological treatment modification.

2型糖尿病患者的电话和血糖控制:一项符合prisma标准的随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
AIMSI缺乏对2型糖尿病(T2DM)管理中的电话进行评估的深度和最新系统综述。本研究旨在评估与常规护理相比,这种干预措施对T2DM患者血糖控制的影响。方法截至2021年3月,我们使用Medline、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央登记册、护理和相关健康文献累积指数(CINAHL)和LILACS系统搜索了T2DM的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用风险偏差2.0(Rob 2.0)工具和GRADE进行质量评估。通过糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化来估计干预效果。PROSPERO注册中心CRD42020204519.RESULTS3545参考文献被审查,32例被纳入(8598名患者)。电话,所有接受教育的人,HbA1c改善0.33%[95%CI,-0.48%至-0.18%;I2 = 78%;p < 0.0001]。当干预措施包括药物修饰时,发现有更大的改善(-0.82%,95%CI,-1.42%至-0.22%;I2 = 92%),护士应用时(-0.53%,95%CI,-0.86%至-0.2%;I2 = 87%)。Meta回归显示DM持续时间与HbA1c变化之间没有关系。结论电话干预对2型糖尿病的血糖控制有好处,特别是如果由护士提供,或者如果与患者教育和药物治疗相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信