Civil War Field Artillery: Promise and Performance on the Battlefield by Earl J. Hess (review)

IF 0.2 Q4 HISTORY
W. Hsieh
{"title":"Civil War Field Artillery: Promise and Performance on the Battlefield by Earl J. Hess (review)","authors":"W. Hsieh","doi":"10.1353/khs.2023.a902570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ever-productive Earl J. Hess has once again authored a worthy monograph on a notable lacuna in the military history of the American Civil War—field artillery. Despite being the second most important combat arm of Civil War field armies, as measured by its ubiquity on the battlefield, the so-called “King of Battle” has received relatively little attention. While operational military historians continue to produce campaign and unit studies and biographies of generals, Hess has written the first major operational study in decades that places field artillery in the larger historical context of Western military history and American military practice. Hess argues that while Civil War field artillery saw an evolutionary improvement in range and effectiveness after its inception in the Napoleonic era due to innovations like rifling, such advances did not represent a sharp break from prior military practice because of persistent problems with reliable fuses and fire control. Much of the prior literature on Civil War artillery has focused on equipment and material. Hess’ work is the first attempt at covering the material, employment, and administration field artillery as a whole, in both the Union and Confederate armies. While all competent battle studies include coverage of the use of artillery at that specific engagement, the distinctive equipment, organization, and administration of artillery requires the sort of examination provided by Hess. The fruits of Hess’ research also highlights that our understanding of cavalry would benefit from such a comparable study—at present, there only exists an extensive scholarly overview of Union cavalry—a magisterial multi-volume study by Stephen Z. Starr titled The Union Cavalry in the Civil War (1979–1985). Hess’ study of artillery makes particularly important contributions to larger historiographical debates about the American Civil War’s modernity and the relationship between nineteenth and twentieth","PeriodicalId":40382,"journal":{"name":"Register of the Kentucky Historical Society","volume":"121 1","pages":"72 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Register of the Kentucky Historical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/khs.2023.a902570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ever-productive Earl J. Hess has once again authored a worthy monograph on a notable lacuna in the military history of the American Civil War—field artillery. Despite being the second most important combat arm of Civil War field armies, as measured by its ubiquity on the battlefield, the so-called “King of Battle” has received relatively little attention. While operational military historians continue to produce campaign and unit studies and biographies of generals, Hess has written the first major operational study in decades that places field artillery in the larger historical context of Western military history and American military practice. Hess argues that while Civil War field artillery saw an evolutionary improvement in range and effectiveness after its inception in the Napoleonic era due to innovations like rifling, such advances did not represent a sharp break from prior military practice because of persistent problems with reliable fuses and fire control. Much of the prior literature on Civil War artillery has focused on equipment and material. Hess’ work is the first attempt at covering the material, employment, and administration field artillery as a whole, in both the Union and Confederate armies. While all competent battle studies include coverage of the use of artillery at that specific engagement, the distinctive equipment, organization, and administration of artillery requires the sort of examination provided by Hess. The fruits of Hess’ research also highlights that our understanding of cavalry would benefit from such a comparable study—at present, there only exists an extensive scholarly overview of Union cavalry—a magisterial multi-volume study by Stephen Z. Starr titled The Union Cavalry in the Civil War (1979–1985). Hess’ study of artillery makes particularly important contributions to larger historiographical debates about the American Civil War’s modernity and the relationship between nineteenth and twentieth
《内战野战炮兵:战场上的承诺与表现》作者:厄尔·j·赫斯
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书