Revisiting the concept of defence in the jus ad bellum: The dual face of defence

Abstract

the conclusion, the author recognises that his analysis is based on the ‘state’s monopoly on the use of force, the rule of law, and respect for human rights’ (343), and it is worth remembering that triptych when faced with alarming tendencies for states, organisations and individuals to use lethal force beyond what is immediately necessary to defend themselves. The book is an impressive defence of a limited right that we all recognise but struggle to conceptualise and define given that its application is context specific. There is no doubt in this reviewer’s mind that this book will be a key reference point for academics and lawyers, as well as law and policy makers, working in the area.