Strategic planning policy post-pandemic: the “Great Land Question”

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
J. Ratcliffe
{"title":"Strategic planning policy post-pandemic: the “Great Land Question”","authors":"J. Ratcliffe","doi":"10.1108/JPIF-03-2021-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to explore the case for the radical reform of land policy worldwide. It does so, however, in the context of present problems posed by the prevailing coronavirus pandemic. It is a strategic study, not a scientific analysis and is oriented towards the field of the built environment in general and the real estate industry in particular.Design/methodology/approachAlthough it draws on concepts of land management long extolled and covers concerns currently circulating about the prospects for urban planning and property development post-pandemic, the synthesis is original.FindingsThe concluding counsel is that land policy reform, being a component factor of so much of society's endeavours, should figure far more prominently across the political platforms of the world.Practical implicationsMost of the material regarding the “Great Land Question” is based on findings from countless strategic foresight studies conducted by the author over the past 25 years and re-assessed in light of the pandemic. If correct, the practical implications will be significant.Originality/valueThis is a review of existing models.","PeriodicalId":46429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Investment & Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Investment & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-03-2021-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to explore the case for the radical reform of land policy worldwide. It does so, however, in the context of present problems posed by the prevailing coronavirus pandemic. It is a strategic study, not a scientific analysis and is oriented towards the field of the built environment in general and the real estate industry in particular.Design/methodology/approachAlthough it draws on concepts of land management long extolled and covers concerns currently circulating about the prospects for urban planning and property development post-pandemic, the synthesis is original.FindingsThe concluding counsel is that land policy reform, being a component factor of so much of society's endeavours, should figure far more prominently across the political platforms of the world.Practical implicationsMost of the material regarding the “Great Land Question” is based on findings from countless strategic foresight studies conducted by the author over the past 25 years and re-assessed in light of the pandemic. If correct, the practical implications will be significant.Originality/valueThis is a review of existing models.
大流行后的战略规划政策:“大土地问题”
目的本文旨在探讨世界范围内土地政策的根本性改革。然而,它是在当前流行的冠状病毒大流行带来的问题的背景下这样做的。这是一项战略研究,而不是科学分析,主要针对建筑环境领域,尤其是房地产行业。设计/方法论/方法尽管它借鉴了长期以来备受推崇的土地管理概念,并涵盖了目前流行的对疫情后城市规划和房地产开发前景的担忧,但该综合报告是原创的。结论性意见是,土地政策改革作为社会诸多努力的一个组成因素,应该在世界政治纲领中占据更重要的地位。实际含义大多数关于“大土地问题”的材料都是基于作者在过去25年中进行的无数战略前瞻研究的结果,并根据疫情进行了重新评估。如果正确的话,实际意义将是重大的。原创性/价值这是对现有模型的回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Fully refereed papers on practice and methodology in the UK, continental Western Europe, emerging markets of Eastern Europe, China, Australasia, Africa and the USA, in the following areas: ■Academic papers on the latest research, thinking and developments ■Law reports assessing new legislation ■Market data for a comprehensive review of current research ■Practice papers - a forum for the exchange of ideas and experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信