Slovakness in the Making: The Concept of “Nation” and “National Literature” in the Works of 1930s Literary Critics

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Viliam Nádaskay
{"title":"Slovakness in the Making: The Concept of “Nation” and “National Literature” in the Works of 1930s Literary Critics","authors":"Viliam Nádaskay","doi":"10.31577/forhist.2022.16.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NÁDASKAY, Viliam. Slovakness in the Making: The Concept of “Nation” and “National Literature” in the Works of 1930s Literary Critics. The study outlines the opinions on and sources of the so-called Slovak question in the interwar Czechoslovak republic amongst the writings of three Slovak literary critics: Stanislav Mečiar, Andrej Kostolný and Michal Chorváth. Each author stood for a different contemporary ideology; nationalist/autonomist, Czechoslovakist and communist, respectively. The current article details the ways and reasons these critics legitimised national self-determination, whether by invoking the legacy of the national awakening and those stereotypical historical narratives of Slovak oppression, equality and fulfilment within a common Czechoslovak state, or through the idea of social revolution and stark op-position to tradition deriving from modernist distrust and a general fragmentation of the world and society. Opinions on the problem with the Slovakness of national literature are also illustrated, as well as its place within the context of world literature, including an analysis of how these ideological rivals shared certain attitudes towards the national self-determination of Slovaks, yet differed greatly in their ideas on its manifestation. On the one hand, cooperation among literary intelligentsia may be seen as an effort to remain internally united while facing an impending world war; on the other hand, it could be inter-preted as another part of the ideological struggle, as the case of the famous Congress of Slovak Writers seems to demonstrate.","PeriodicalId":37228,"journal":{"name":"Forum Historiae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum Historiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/forhist.2022.16.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

NÁDASKAY, Viliam. Slovakness in the Making: The Concept of “Nation” and “National Literature” in the Works of 1930s Literary Critics. The study outlines the opinions on and sources of the so-called Slovak question in the interwar Czechoslovak republic amongst the writings of three Slovak literary critics: Stanislav Mečiar, Andrej Kostolný and Michal Chorváth. Each author stood for a different contemporary ideology; nationalist/autonomist, Czechoslovakist and communist, respectively. The current article details the ways and reasons these critics legitimised national self-determination, whether by invoking the legacy of the national awakening and those stereotypical historical narratives of Slovak oppression, equality and fulfilment within a common Czechoslovak state, or through the idea of social revolution and stark op-position to tradition deriving from modernist distrust and a general fragmentation of the world and society. Opinions on the problem with the Slovakness of national literature are also illustrated, as well as its place within the context of world literature, including an analysis of how these ideological rivals shared certain attitudes towards the national self-determination of Slovaks, yet differed greatly in their ideas on its manifestation. On the one hand, cooperation among literary intelligentsia may be seen as an effort to remain internally united while facing an impending world war; on the other hand, it could be inter-preted as another part of the ideological struggle, as the case of the famous Congress of Slovak Writers seems to demonstrate.
形成中的斯洛伐克:20世纪30年代文学批评作品中的“民族”与“民族文学”概念
NADASKAY Viliam。形成中的斯洛伐克:20世纪30年代文学批评作品中的“民族”与“民族文学”概念。该研究概述了在三名斯洛伐克文学评论家Stanislav me iar, Andrej Kostolný和Michal Chorváth的著作中,在两次世界大战之间的捷克斯洛伐克共和国对所谓斯洛伐克问题的看法和来源。每位作者都代表着不同的当代意识形态;民族主义者/自治主义者,捷克斯洛伐克主义者和共产主义者。本文详细介绍了这些批评者将民族自决合法化的方式和原因,无论是通过援引民族觉醒的遗产和斯洛伐克压迫的刻板历史叙述,捷克斯洛伐克共同国家内的平等和实现,还是通过社会革命的想法和对传统的鲜明反对,源自现代主义的不信任和世界和社会的普遍分裂。本文也阐述了对斯洛伐克民族文学问题的看法,以及它在世界文学背景下的地位,包括分析这些意识形态上的对手如何对斯洛伐克民族自决持相同的态度,但对其表现形式的看法却大相径庭。一方面,文学知识分子之间的合作可以被看作是在面对即将到来的世界大战时保持内部团结的努力;另一方面,它可以被解释为意识形态斗争的另一部分,正如著名的斯洛伐克作家大会的情况所表明的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forum Historiae
Forum Historiae Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信