Type B uncertainty of two-channel measurements

IF 0.1 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
M. Dorozhovets
{"title":"Type B uncertainty of two-channel measurements","authors":"M. Dorozhovets","doi":"10.24027/2306-7039.4.2022.276316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents the problems of evaluating the standard uncertainty of measuring a quantity using the type B method, the result of which is the average value of the results obtained from two channels with the same parameters, for example, as the indications of two measuring instruments of the same type. It is shown that for given values of maximum permissible errors (MPE) of measuring instruments and their readings x1 and x2, the uncertainty of the result determined a posteriori is not equal to the uncertainty determined by the conventional method (GUM). It is shown that when the measurement result is determined as arithmetic mean y=(x1+x2)/2, additional information as the half distance of readings v=|x1-x2|/2 can be used to correctly determine the standard uncertainty of such measurement. Depending on the half distance of readings, the standard uncertainty can theoretically vary from its maximum value (the readings of both meters are equal) to zero (with maximum difference in readings). The analysis of the uncertainty was carried out for uniform distributions of possible deviations of the readings of measuring instruments within their MPE. The results of simulations by the modified Monte-Carlo method, which show good convergence with theoretical results, are given.","PeriodicalId":40775,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Metrological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Metrological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24027/2306-7039.4.2022.276316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper presents the problems of evaluating the standard uncertainty of measuring a quantity using the type B method, the result of which is the average value of the results obtained from two channels with the same parameters, for example, as the indications of two measuring instruments of the same type. It is shown that for given values of maximum permissible errors (MPE) of measuring instruments and their readings x1 and x2, the uncertainty of the result determined a posteriori is not equal to the uncertainty determined by the conventional method (GUM). It is shown that when the measurement result is determined as arithmetic mean y=(x1+x2)/2, additional information as the half distance of readings v=|x1-x2|/2 can be used to correctly determine the standard uncertainty of such measurement. Depending on the half distance of readings, the standard uncertainty can theoretically vary from its maximum value (the readings of both meters are equal) to zero (with maximum difference in readings). The analysis of the uncertainty was carried out for uniform distributions of possible deviations of the readings of measuring instruments within their MPE. The results of simulations by the modified Monte-Carlo method, which show good convergence with theoretical results, are given.
双通道测量的B型不确定度
本文介绍了使用B型方法评估测量量的标准不确定度的问题,该方法的结果是从具有相同参数的两个通道获得的结果的平均值,例如,作为同一类型的两个测量仪器的指示。结果表明,对于给定的测量仪器的最大允许误差(MPE)值及其读数x1和x2,后验确定的结果的不确定性不等于传统方法(GUM)确定的不确定性。结果表明,当测量结果被确定为算术平均值y=(x1+x2)/2时,可以使用诸如读数的半距离v=|x1-x2|/2的附加信息来正确地确定这种测量的标准不确定度。根据读数的半距离,标准不确定度理论上可以从其最大值(两个仪表的读数相等)到零(读数差异最大)不等。对测量仪器读数在MPE范围内可能偏差的均匀分布进行了不确定度分析。文中给出了改进蒙特卡罗方法的仿真结果,与理论结果具有良好的收敛性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ukrainian Metrological Journal
Ukrainian Metrological Journal INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信