M. Raskovic, K. Takacs-Haynes
{"title":"(Re)discovering social identity theory: an agenda for multinational enterprise internalization theory","authors":"M. Raskovic, K. Takacs-Haynes","doi":"10.1108/mbr-02-2020-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited. Purpose: Firm internalization is a central concept within the business strategy literature, as part of the broader social sciences. The purpose of this paper is to show how and where MNE internalization theory can benefit from a social identity theory (SIT) perspective to better understand 21st-century multinational enterprises (MNEs). Design/methodology/approach: This paper provides a review and future research agenda for the use of SIT related to MNE internalization theory. The authors complement an evolutionary review of SIT literature with a systematic bibliometric analysis identifying specific thematic gaps. Extending Buckley and Casson’s review of and future research agenda for MNE internalization theory, the authors propose three specific future research directions along with eight guiding research questions. Findings: International business (IB) scholars are familiar with limited aspects of SIT and apply it only in certain research areas, mainly connected to human resource management and leadership, organizational identity and work-related outcomes or international marketing. Strategic management and strategy-oriented IB scholars are less familiar with SIT, despite growing interest in MNE micro-foundations and decision-making under uncertainty. Originality/value: The authors position SIT as a natural meta-theoretical fit to MNE internalization theory. By providing a future research agenda along with eight supporting research questions, the authors help to advance the MNE internalization theory by linking individual, group and intergroup perspectives against a more socially nuanced, interactionist and dynamic view of MNEs and their decision-making.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/mbr-02-2020-0031","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mbr-02-2020-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
(再)发现社会认同理论:跨国企业内部化理论的一个议程
©2020,翡翠出版有限公司。目的:企业内部化是商业战略文献中的一个核心概念,也是更广泛的社会科学的一部分。本文的目的是展示跨国企业内部化理论如何以及在哪里可以从社会身份理论(SIT)的角度受益,以更好地理解21世纪的跨国企业。设计/方法论/方法:本文提供了与MNE内化理论相关的SIT的使用回顾和未来的研究议程。作者通过系统的文献计量分析来补充SIT文献的进化综述,确定特定的主题差距。作者扩展了Buckley和Casson对MNE内化理论的回顾和未来的研究议程,提出了三个具体的未来研究方向以及八个具有指导意义的研究问题。研究结果:国际商业(IB)学者熟悉SIT的有限方面,仅将其应用于某些研究领域,主要与人力资源管理和领导力、组织身份和工作成果或国际营销有关。战略管理和战略导向的IB学者对SIT不太熟悉,尽管他们对MNE微观基础和不确定性下的决策越来越感兴趣。原创性/价值:作者将SIT定位为与MNE内化理论相适应的自然元理论。通过提供未来的研究议程和八个支持性研究问题,作者将个人、群体和群体间的观点与对跨国公司及其决策的更具社会敏感性、互动性和动态性的观点联系起来,帮助推进跨国公司内部化理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。