Could regulatory information disclosure impact the behaviour of corporate over-financialization? Evidence from Chinese comment letters

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Youfu Yao, Lan Zhou
{"title":"Could regulatory information disclosure impact the behaviour of corporate over-financialization? Evidence from Chinese comment letters","authors":"Youfu Yao, Lan Zhou","doi":"10.1080/21697213.2022.2143675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Taking Chinese A-share listed firms from 2014 to 2018 as our samples, this paper investigates the impact of regulatory information disclosure on corporate over-financialisation behaviour from comment letters. The empirical results show that financialisation-related comment letters can effectively reduce the behaviour of corporate over-financialisation, and this positive governance effect is more pronounced in companies with strong market arbitrage motivation. Further tests show that the more intensity of the financialisation-related comment letters, the higher the governance effect of comment letters on over-financialisation. Specifically, the governance effect of inquiries mechanism is more significant when the financialisation-related comment letters have the questions of “over-financialisation’. From the specific influence mechanism, the governance effect of financialisation-related comment letters is achieved by potential violation cost and the pressure of market attention. Finally, the governance effect of financialisation-related comment letters on over-financialisation can spill over to non-comment-letter-receivers in the same industry or in the same corporation groups.","PeriodicalId":37215,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Accounting Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"411 - 433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Accounting Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2022.2143675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Taking Chinese A-share listed firms from 2014 to 2018 as our samples, this paper investigates the impact of regulatory information disclosure on corporate over-financialisation behaviour from comment letters. The empirical results show that financialisation-related comment letters can effectively reduce the behaviour of corporate over-financialisation, and this positive governance effect is more pronounced in companies with strong market arbitrage motivation. Further tests show that the more intensity of the financialisation-related comment letters, the higher the governance effect of comment letters on over-financialisation. Specifically, the governance effect of inquiries mechanism is more significant when the financialisation-related comment letters have the questions of “over-financialisation’. From the specific influence mechanism, the governance effect of financialisation-related comment letters is achieved by potential violation cost and the pressure of market attention. Finally, the governance effect of financialisation-related comment letters on over-financialisation can spill over to non-comment-letter-receivers in the same industry or in the same corporation groups.
监管信息披露是否会影响企业的过度金融化行为?来自中国评论信的证据
摘要本文以2014-2018年中国A股上市公司为样本,从评论信的角度考察了监管信息披露对企业过度融资行为的影响。实证结果表明,与金融化相关的评论信可以有效地减少企业过度金融化的行为,这种积极的治理效应在市场套利动机较强的公司中更为明显。进一步的测试表明,与金融化相关的评论信的强度越大,评论信对过度金融化的治理效果就越高。明确地当金融化相关评论信存在以下问题时,质询机制的治理效果更为显著“过度金融化”。从具体的影响机制来看,与金融化相关的评论信的治理效果是通过潜在的违规成本和市场关注的压力来实现的演讲小组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
China Journal of Accounting Studies
China Journal of Accounting Studies Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信