{"title":"Stability Recovery in London Plane Trees Eight Years After Primary Anchorage Failure","authors":"Andrea Detter, Philip van Wassenaer, S. Rust","doi":"10.48044/jauf.2019.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the intensity and frequency of strong storms increase, the potential for damage to urban trees also increases. So far, the risk of ultimate failure for partially uprooted trees and how they may recover their stability is not well understood. This study sets out to explore if and to what extent trees can regain anchoring strength after their root systems have been overloaded. In 2010, ten London Plane (Platanus × acerifolia) trees were subjected to destructive winching tests. Two trees were pulled to the ground while eight were loaded until primary anchorage failure occurred and were left standing with inclined stems. In 2013, two trees had failed and six were re-tested nondestructively. By 2018, another tree had failed, and we tested the remaining five again. Rotational stiffness was derived for all trials and served as a nondestructive proxy for anchoring strength (R² = 0.91). After eight years, one tree had regained its original strength, while four had reached between 71 and 82% of their initial rotational stiffness. However, three trees failed during the observation period. The results indicate that partially uprooted trees may re-establish stability over time, but some will not and may fail. In our small data set, it was not possible to identify visual criteria that could provide a reliable indication of tree stability recovery, but our data support the assumption that nondestructive pulling tests can be successfully employed to determine good vigorous candidates for retention after partial uprooting.","PeriodicalId":39043,"journal":{"name":"Arboriculture and Urban Forestry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arboriculture and Urban Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2019.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
As the intensity and frequency of strong storms increase, the potential for damage to urban trees also increases. So far, the risk of ultimate failure for partially uprooted trees and how they may recover their stability is not well understood. This study sets out to explore if and to what extent trees can regain anchoring strength after their root systems have been overloaded. In 2010, ten London Plane (Platanus × acerifolia) trees were subjected to destructive winching tests. Two trees were pulled to the ground while eight were loaded until primary anchorage failure occurred and were left standing with inclined stems. In 2013, two trees had failed and six were re-tested nondestructively. By 2018, another tree had failed, and we tested the remaining five again. Rotational stiffness was derived for all trials and served as a nondestructive proxy for anchoring strength (R² = 0.91). After eight years, one tree had regained its original strength, while four had reached between 71 and 82% of their initial rotational stiffness. However, three trees failed during the observation period. The results indicate that partially uprooted trees may re-establish stability over time, but some will not and may fail. In our small data set, it was not possible to identify visual criteria that could provide a reliable indication of tree stability recovery, but our data support the assumption that nondestructive pulling tests can be successfully employed to determine good vigorous candidates for retention after partial uprooting.
随着强风暴的强度和频率增加,对城市树木造成破坏的可能性也在增加。到目前为止,部分被连根拔起的树木最终失败的风险,以及它们如何恢复稳定,还没有得到很好的了解。这项研究旨在探索树木在根系超载后是否能够恢复锚定力,以及在多大程度上能够恢复锚定力。2010年,10棵伦敦平面(Platanus x acerifolia)树进行了破坏性绞车试验。两棵树被拉到地面,八棵树被加载,直到主要锚固发生破坏,并留下倾斜的树干。2013年,两棵采油树失败,六棵进行了无损测试。到2018年,又有一棵树失败了,我们又对剩下的五棵树进行了测试。所有试验均推导出旋转刚度,并作为锚固强度的非破坏性代理(R²= 0.91)。八年后,一棵树恢复了原来的强度,而四棵树的旋转刚度达到了最初的71%到82%。然而,在观察期间,有三棵树失败。结果表明,部分被连根拔起的树木可能会随着时间的推移重新建立稳定,但有些不会,可能会失败。在我们的小数据集中,不可能确定可以提供可靠指示的树木稳定性恢复的视觉标准,但我们的数据支持这样的假设,即无损拔拔试验可以成功地用于确定部分连根拔后良好的有力保留候选者。