Subversive Sites 20 Years Later: Rethinking Feminist Engagements with Law

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
R. Kapur, B. Cossman
{"title":"Subversive Sites 20 Years Later: Rethinking Feminist Engagements with Law","authors":"R. Kapur, B. Cossman","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2018.1521257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, we revisit our co-authored book, Subversive Sites. We explore both what we might have done differently with explicit attention to postcolonial theory, queer theory and neoliberal critiques and what part of the analysis still has traction. We then consider three legal interventions related to violence against women: sexual harassment, domestic violence and rape. We ask two questions: (1) What would the theoretical analysis from Subversive Sites reveal in relation to each of these legal engagements? (2) How would attention to the postcolonial, the carceral and the sexual reveal what we might not have seen from with the Subversive Sites lens?","PeriodicalId":43532,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"265 - 287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13200968.2018.1521257","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2018.1521257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we revisit our co-authored book, Subversive Sites. We explore both what we might have done differently with explicit attention to postcolonial theory, queer theory and neoliberal critiques and what part of the analysis still has traction. We then consider three legal interventions related to violence against women: sexual harassment, domestic violence and rape. We ask two questions: (1) What would the theoretical analysis from Subversive Sites reveal in relation to each of these legal engagements? (2) How would attention to the postcolonial, the carceral and the sexual reveal what we might not have seen from with the Subversive Sites lens?
20年后的颠覆性遗址:女性主义与法律交往的再思考
在这篇文章中,我们重温了我们合著的书,颠覆网站。我们探讨了我们在明确关注后殖民理论、酷儿理论和新自由主义批评方面可能做得不同的地方,以及分析的哪些部分仍然有吸引力。然后,我们考虑与针对妇女的暴力有关的三种法律干预措施:性骚扰、家庭暴力和强奸。我们提出两个问题:(1)颠覆网站的理论分析将揭示与这些法律约定相关的什么?(2)对后殖民、暴力和性的关注将如何揭示我们从颠覆地点的镜头中可能看不到的东西?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
40.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信