{"title":"Limits to Local Sourcing in Herbaceous Plant Restoration","authors":"Catherine Mabry McMullen","doi":"10.3368/er.40.1.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The appropriate collection zone for seeds and transplants is a key concern for plant restoration ecology, with local sourcing thought to be the “gold standard.” Local sourcing is based on the premise that most plant species are genetically adapted to the local environment through the action of natural selection, and that non-local ecotypes will disrupt this adaptation. However, a number of factors may allow practitioners to expand sourcing. These include genetic variation that is non-adaptive, phenotypic plasticity, climate change, disturbance, and a host of practical issues. These factors are reflected in the range of collection zone protocols that have been developed by practitioners, ranging from local sourcing to bypassing species identity in favor of function. In addition, phenotypic plasticity, because it allows a single genotype to produce different phenotypes in response to environmental variation, may also allow for a broadened collection zone. Little is known about the degree of genetic variation and local adaptation for most plant species. More evidence-based sourcing could result from collaboration between researchers and practitioners, including tracking seed and plant sources, their performance at restoration sites, and conducting reciprocal transplant studies. Inferring the degree of gene flow based on morphological characters has also shown some promise for inferring genetic variation among populations. Research that includes more robust sampling of populations within species would lead to more precise estimates of gene flow in relation to plant traits.","PeriodicalId":11492,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Restoration","volume":"40 1","pages":"64 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.40.1.64","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The appropriate collection zone for seeds and transplants is a key concern for plant restoration ecology, with local sourcing thought to be the “gold standard.” Local sourcing is based on the premise that most plant species are genetically adapted to the local environment through the action of natural selection, and that non-local ecotypes will disrupt this adaptation. However, a number of factors may allow practitioners to expand sourcing. These include genetic variation that is non-adaptive, phenotypic plasticity, climate change, disturbance, and a host of practical issues. These factors are reflected in the range of collection zone protocols that have been developed by practitioners, ranging from local sourcing to bypassing species identity in favor of function. In addition, phenotypic plasticity, because it allows a single genotype to produce different phenotypes in response to environmental variation, may also allow for a broadened collection zone. Little is known about the degree of genetic variation and local adaptation for most plant species. More evidence-based sourcing could result from collaboration between researchers and practitioners, including tracking seed and plant sources, their performance at restoration sites, and conducting reciprocal transplant studies. Inferring the degree of gene flow based on morphological characters has also shown some promise for inferring genetic variation among populations. Research that includes more robust sampling of populations within species would lead to more precise estimates of gene flow in relation to plant traits.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Restoration is a forum for people advancing the science and practice of restoration ecology. It features the technical and biological aspects of restoring landscapes, as well as collaborations between restorationists and the design professions, land-use policy, the role of education, and more. This quarterly publication includes peer-reviewed science articles, perspectives and notes, book reviews, abstracts of restoration ecology progress published elsewhere, and announcements of scientific and professional meetings.