Public health approaches to control injuries

Journal of Injury and Violence Research Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1473

maryam baradaran binazir

{"title":"Public health approaches to control injuries","authors":"maryam baradaran binazir","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: Injuries are a focus of public health practice, because they pose a serious health threat. Injuries ‎are preventable in most situations. Despite successes in many areas of injury prevention, the ‎potential of preventing traumatic injuries has not been realized. There remains much to be done. ‎The aim of this study was to investigate different public health approaches to injury control by ‎article review.‎ Methods: In the present review article, reputable internet databases were investigated. Studies that ‎considered models of public health in injuries control were included in this review. The ‎following databases were accessed for the period from beginning to 2018 for English ‎publications: Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Science Direct .The terms “public health ‎models” and “injury” were used. Articles had to meet the following inclusion criteria: focus on ‎public health models and focus on injuries. The articles were critically appraised by using tools ‎developed by the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). The models were revealed by the ‎literature reviewed, summarized for data synthesis. ‎ Results: From the literature review, we found two models in this area. First one is the causal model for ‎traumatic injuries. It is easily adopted from the traditional epidemiologic causal model. The ‎second one is the public health model. It advocate a cycle of surveillance, risk factor ‎identification, intervention implementation and evaluation. ‎ Conclusions: The public health model and the causal model for traumatic injuries are sustainable framework ‎to use in injury control and prevention.‎ Keywords: Injury, Public health, Model","PeriodicalId":32422,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Injury and Violence Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Injury and Violence Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Injuries are a focus of public health practice, because they pose a serious health threat. Injuries ‎are preventable in most situations. Despite successes in many areas of injury prevention, the ‎potential of preventing traumatic injuries has not been realized. There remains much to be done. ‎The aim of this study was to investigate different public health approaches to injury control by ‎article review.‎ Methods: In the present review article, reputable internet databases were investigated. Studies that ‎considered models of public health in injuries control were included in this review. The ‎following databases were accessed for the period from beginning to 2018 for English ‎publications: Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Science Direct .The terms “public health ‎models” and “injury” were used. Articles had to meet the following inclusion criteria: focus on ‎public health models and focus on injuries. The articles were critically appraised by using tools ‎developed by the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). The models were revealed by the ‎literature reviewed, summarized for data synthesis. ‎ Results: From the literature review, we found two models in this area. First one is the causal model for ‎traumatic injuries. It is easily adopted from the traditional epidemiologic causal model. The ‎second one is the public health model. It advocate a cycle of surveillance, risk factor ‎identification, intervention implementation and evaluation. ‎ Conclusions: The public health model and the causal model for traumatic injuries are sustainable framework ‎to use in injury control and prevention.‎ Keywords: Injury, Public health, Model

查看原文本刊更多论文

控制伤害的公共卫生方法

摘要:背景:伤害是公共卫生实践关注的焦点，因为它对健康构成了严重威胁。在大多数情况下，伤害是可以预防的。尽管在许多伤害预防领域取得了成功，但预防创伤性伤害的潜力尚未实现。还有许多工作要做。本研究的目的是通过文献综述来探讨不同的公共卫生方法对伤害控制的影响。方法:在这篇综述文章中，调查了知名的网络数据库。本综述纳入了考虑伤害控制中的公共卫生模型的研究。从2018年开始到2018年，我们访问了以下英文出版物数据库:谷歌Scholar、PubMed、Scopus和Science Direct，使用了“公共卫生模型”和“伤害”这两个术语。文章必须符合以下纳入标准:关注公共卫生模型并关注伤害。文章通过使用由批判性评估技能计划(CASP)开发的工具进行批判性评估。这些模型是通过文献综述揭示的，并进行了数据综合总结。结果:从文献综述中，我们发现了这一领域的两个模型。第一个是创伤性损伤的因果模型。它很容易从传统的流行病学因果模型中被采用。第二个是公共卫生模式。它倡导监测、风险因素识别、干预措施实施和评价的循环。结论:外伤性损伤的公共卫生模型和因果模型是可用于损伤控制和预防的可持续框架。关键词:伤害，公共卫生，模型

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Injury and Violence Research

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Injury and Violence Research (JIVR) is a peer-reviewed open-access medical journal covering all aspects of traumatology includes quantitative and qualitative studies in the field of clinical and basic sciences about trauma, burns, drowning, falls, occupational/road/ sport safety, youth violence, child/elder abuse, child/elder injuries, intimate partner abuse/sexual violence, self-harm, suicide, patient safety, safe communities, consumer safety, disaster management, terrorism, surveillance/burden of injury and all other intentional and unintentional injuries.