Book Review: Saint Mary of Egypt. A Modern Verse Life and Interpretation

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 N/A RELIGION
Luke Macnamara
{"title":"Book Review: Saint Mary of Egypt. A Modern Verse Life and Interpretation","authors":"Luke Macnamara","doi":"10.1177/00211400221150549c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In broad terms, the central theme of O’Rourke’s inquiry is the question of identity in Joyce’s writings. The question of identity is ultimately a philosophical question; the principle of identity is considered the first law of reality, and in Joyce’s work and life the question of the self and its identity loom large. Who is he? Irish, Catholic, European, himself? Identity also brings the questions of change and permanence, unity and diversity to the table. These are questions which Aristotle had addressed, using the categories of potency and act, matter and form, substance, accident and soul. Joyce found these categories invaluable in grounding the enduring identity of his characters. Throughout Ulysses, dialogues between Stephen Dedalus and Bloom and Buck Mulligan offer us a privileged view of the contrast between the reductionist approach of Mulligan and Bloom to human self-identity, (‘sure it’s all just corpuscles or whatever’) and Stephen’s own Aristotelian sense of the presence of an eidos, form or rationale giving shape and animation to the material ‘stuff’ of the world, be that stuff cells or atoms or corpuscles (cf. pp. 50–51, 109–10). Finally, Joyce’s theory of aesthetics owes much to Aquinas, though for O’Rourke he missed out on the metaphysical heart of Aquinas’s thought on beauty as a transcendental quality of reality, turning Aquinas into an aesthete. Ironically, the aesthetics which drove him from the Church, according to one critic quoted by O’Rourke, is derived from Aquinas, albeit from Joyce’s partial reading of him (p. 204). Joyce, Aristotle, and Aquinas is a tour de force which helps to see Joyce against the background of his initial philosophical formation in Aristotle and Aquinas, a formation which moulded his approach to the philosophical questions which arise in his works; questions which the philosophia perennis, the philosophical tradition emerging from classical thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle had raised and were creatively received and rethought by Aquinas and other medieval thinkers, Christian and Muslim.","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Theological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221150549c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In broad terms, the central theme of O’Rourke’s inquiry is the question of identity in Joyce’s writings. The question of identity is ultimately a philosophical question; the principle of identity is considered the first law of reality, and in Joyce’s work and life the question of the self and its identity loom large. Who is he? Irish, Catholic, European, himself? Identity also brings the questions of change and permanence, unity and diversity to the table. These are questions which Aristotle had addressed, using the categories of potency and act, matter and form, substance, accident and soul. Joyce found these categories invaluable in grounding the enduring identity of his characters. Throughout Ulysses, dialogues between Stephen Dedalus and Bloom and Buck Mulligan offer us a privileged view of the contrast between the reductionist approach of Mulligan and Bloom to human self-identity, (‘sure it’s all just corpuscles or whatever’) and Stephen’s own Aristotelian sense of the presence of an eidos, form or rationale giving shape and animation to the material ‘stuff’ of the world, be that stuff cells or atoms or corpuscles (cf. pp. 50–51, 109–10). Finally, Joyce’s theory of aesthetics owes much to Aquinas, though for O’Rourke he missed out on the metaphysical heart of Aquinas’s thought on beauty as a transcendental quality of reality, turning Aquinas into an aesthete. Ironically, the aesthetics which drove him from the Church, according to one critic quoted by O’Rourke, is derived from Aquinas, albeit from Joyce’s partial reading of him (p. 204). Joyce, Aristotle, and Aquinas is a tour de force which helps to see Joyce against the background of his initial philosophical formation in Aristotle and Aquinas, a formation which moulded his approach to the philosophical questions which arise in his works; questions which the philosophia perennis, the philosophical tradition emerging from classical thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle had raised and were creatively received and rethought by Aquinas and other medieval thinkers, Christian and Muslim.
书评:埃及的圣玛丽。现代诗歌生活与解读
从广义上讲,奥探究的中心主题是乔伊斯作品中的身份问题。身份问题归根结底是一个哲学问题;同一性原则被认为是现实的第一定律,在乔伊斯的作品和生活中,自我及其同一性问题显得尤为突出。他是谁?爱尔兰人,天主教徒,欧洲人,他自己?身份也带来了变化和永久性、统一和多样性的问题。亚里士多德用效力和行为、物质和形式、物质、意外和灵魂的分类来解决这些问题。乔伊斯发现这些类别在奠定他笔下人物的持久身份方面是非常宝贵的。在整个《尤利西斯》中,斯蒂芬·德达勒斯和布鲁姆以及巴克·穆里根之间的对话为我们提供了一种特权,即穆里根和布鲁姆对人类自我认同的还原主义方法(“当然这只是微粒或其他什么”)与斯蒂芬自己的亚里士多德式的eidos存在感之间的对比,赋予世界物质“物质”形状和动画的形式或原理,无论是细胞、原子还是微粒(参见第50–51、109–10页)。最后,乔伊斯的美学理论在很大程度上要归功于阿奎那,尽管对奥来说,他错过了阿奎那关于美作为现实的超越性的思想的形而上学核心,将阿奎那变成了一个唯美主义者。具有讽刺意味的是,根据奥引用的一位评论家的话,驱使他离开教会的美学来源于阿奎那,尽管来自乔伊斯对他的部分解读(第204页)。《乔伊斯、亚里士多德和阿奎那》是一部力量之旅,有助于在《亚里士多德和阿奎纳》中看到乔伊斯最初的哲学形成背景,这种形成塑造了他处理作品中出现的哲学问题的方法;从柏拉图和亚里士多德等古典思想家那里产生的哲学传统,即perennis哲学提出的问题,受到阿奎那和其他中世纪思想家(基督教和穆斯林)的创造性接受和反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
44
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信