Training for nurses using realistic simulation

R. C. Machado, Isabela Cristina de Oliveira, Ledjane Neves Oliveira, J. M. Michel, S. F. Sampaio, A. Sant’Anna, Michelle Mayumi Yoshimura Campos
{"title":"Training for nurses using realistic simulation","authors":"R. C. Machado, Isabela Cristina de Oliveira, Ledjane Neves Oliveira, J. M. Michel, S. F. Sampaio, A. Sant’Anna, Michelle Mayumi Yoshimura Campos","doi":"10.3823/2623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To assess an in situ simulation-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training strategy, with emphasis on debriefing and follow-up assessment of knowledge after training. \nMethod: This was an educational intervention study to measure intraparticipant variability. The simulation-based teaching techniques consisted of nine steps.This research followed STROBE recommendations for the methodological development of observational studies.  \nResults: Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the pre-test and post-theory assessments, and between the pre-practical phase and 60 days post-training. However, no differences were observed (p<0.05) between the post-theory and post-practical phases, showing that after participating in the training strategy, after the pre-test assessment, the participants seemed to have carried over the knowledge displayed in the post-theory to the post-practical time, with considerable reduction in performance 60 days after the training program. \nConclusion: Theoretical emphasis coupled with simulation practice displayed the best results in performance when compared to theoretical training alone, even at 60 days post-training.","PeriodicalId":73409,"journal":{"name":"International archives of medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International archives of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3823/2623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess an in situ simulation-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training strategy, with emphasis on debriefing and follow-up assessment of knowledge after training. Method: This was an educational intervention study to measure intraparticipant variability. The simulation-based teaching techniques consisted of nine steps.This research followed STROBE recommendations for the methodological development of observational studies.  Results: Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the pre-test and post-theory assessments, and between the pre-practical phase and 60 days post-training. However, no differences were observed (p<0.05) between the post-theory and post-practical phases, showing that after participating in the training strategy, after the pre-test assessment, the participants seemed to have carried over the knowledge displayed in the post-theory to the post-practical time, with considerable reduction in performance 60 days after the training program. Conclusion: Theoretical emphasis coupled with simulation practice displayed the best results in performance when compared to theoretical training alone, even at 60 days post-training.
对护士进行真实模拟训练
目的:评估基于现场模拟的心肺复苏训练策略,重点是训练后的汇报和后续知识评估。方法:这是一项教育干预研究,旨在测量参与者内部的变异性。基于模拟的教学技术包括九个步骤。这项研究遵循了STROBE关于观察性研究方法论发展的建议。结果:在测试前和理论后评估之间,以及在实践前阶段和训练后60天之间,观察到显著差异(p<0.05)。然而,在后理论和后实践阶段之间没有观察到差异(p<0.05),这表明在参与训练策略后,在测试前评估后,参与者似乎已经将后理论中显示的知识转移到了后实践时间,在训练计划后60天,表现显著下降。结论:与单独的理论训练相比,即使在训练后60天,理论强调与模拟练习相结合也表现出最好的成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信