A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Intraarticular Platelet Plasma Concentrate and Growth Factors versus Corticosteroid Injections in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

T. Turajane, Pamok Saengsirinavin, Chaivat Sriratanavudhi, Wanpen Lappaiwong, J. Aojanepong
{"title":"A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Intraarticular Platelet Plasma Concentrate and Growth Factors versus Corticosteroid Injections in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis","authors":"T. Turajane, Pamok Saengsirinavin, Chaivat Sriratanavudhi, Wanpen Lappaiwong, J. Aojanepong","doi":"10.31524/BKKMEDJ.2021.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: To compare and evaluate the efficacy of intraarticular platelet-rich growth factor (PRGF) versus intraarticular steroid injections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted by enrolling 650 patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) who did not respond to the combination of oral medication and physiotherapy. After computer-based randomization and exclusion, the number of patients in our study was 557. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (310 patients) received intraarticular PRGF injection and group 2 (247 patients) received intraarticular injection of 40-mg triamcinolone solution. The post-trial follow-up period ranged from 12 to 18.5 months. The primary endpoints were the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and in knee OA. However, optimal preparation techniques are essential for improved clinical outcomes, and further investigation with long-term follow-up is recommended.","PeriodicalId":92144,"journal":{"name":"The Bangkok medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bangkok medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31524/BKKMEDJ.2021.11.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare and evaluate the efficacy of intraarticular platelet-rich growth factor (PRGF) versus intraarticular steroid injections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted by enrolling 650 patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) who did not respond to the combination of oral medication and physiotherapy. After computer-based randomization and exclusion, the number of patients in our study was 557. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (310 patients) received intraarticular PRGF injection and group 2 (247 patients) received intraarticular injection of 40-mg triamcinolone solution. The post-trial follow-up period ranged from 12 to 18.5 months. The primary endpoints were the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and in knee OA. However, optimal preparation techniques are essential for improved clinical outcomes, and further investigation with long-term follow-up is recommended.
一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验,比较关节内血小板血浆浓缩物和生长因子与皮质类固醇注射治疗膝关节骨关节炎的临床结果
目的:比较和评估关节内富血小板生长因子(PRGF)与关节内类固醇注射的疗效。材料和方法:一项前瞻性、盲法、随机对照试验,纳入650例对口服药物和物理治疗联合无效的膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者。经过计算机随机化和排除后,我们研究的患者人数为557人。患者分为两组。1组(310例)关节内注射PRGF, 2组(247例)关节内注射曲安奈德溶液40 mg。试验后随访12 ~ 18.5个月。主要终点是国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分和膝关节OA。然而,最佳的制备技术对于改善临床结果至关重要,建议进行进一步的长期随访研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信