Assessment by Thai academic English writing teachers of the flow of given to new topic information within academic writing

David D. Perrodin
{"title":"Assessment by Thai academic English writing teachers of the flow of given to new topic information within academic writing","authors":"David D. Perrodin","doi":"10.23971/jefl.v11i2.2684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adhering to a structured process of the flow of given to new topic information within academic written discourse is a significant challenge for most tertiary-level non-native EFL students. The progression of given to new topic information in written academic text is equally difficult for many non-native academic English writing teachers to distinguish, much less assess. This research seeks to determine if given to new information progression can be significantly identified, and explore the possibility of such topic progression being utilized as a practical form of academic writing assessment by experienced Thai tertiary teachers of academic English. Multiple Linear Regression was employed to determine the relationship between the Thai writing teachers' identification of the flow of given to new topic information and a preliminary analysis of topic information flow by a qualified native English writing teacher. The insights gained from this study show that the Thai academic English writing teachers could not significantly detect the presence of given to new topic information progression within the academic texts. The implication of this research suggests that at this time, the practical utilization of a given to new progression analysis may not be a feasible evaluative measure in written assessments for Thai academic English writing teachers.","PeriodicalId":31243,"journal":{"name":"Journal on English as a Foreign Language","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on English as a Foreign Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v11i2.2684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adhering to a structured process of the flow of given to new topic information within academic written discourse is a significant challenge for most tertiary-level non-native EFL students. The progression of given to new topic information in written academic text is equally difficult for many non-native academic English writing teachers to distinguish, much less assess. This research seeks to determine if given to new information progression can be significantly identified, and explore the possibility of such topic progression being utilized as a practical form of academic writing assessment by experienced Thai tertiary teachers of academic English. Multiple Linear Regression was employed to determine the relationship between the Thai writing teachers' identification of the flow of given to new topic information and a preliminary analysis of topic information flow by a qualified native English writing teacher. The insights gained from this study show that the Thai academic English writing teachers could not significantly detect the presence of given to new topic information progression within the academic texts. The implication of this research suggests that at this time, the practical utilization of a given to new progression analysis may not be a feasible evaluative measure in written assessments for Thai academic English writing teachers.
泰国学术英语写作教师对学术写作中新主题信息流的评估
在学术书面语篇中,坚持一个结构化的、特定于新主题的信息流的过程,对大多数非母语的大学英语学生来说是一个重大的挑战。对于许多非母语的学术英语写作教师来说,书面学术文本中特定主题信息的进展同样难以区分,更不用说评估了。本研究旨在确定是否可以显著识别新的信息进展,并探索经验丰富的泰国高等学术英语教师将这种主题进展作为学术写作评估的实用形式的可能性。采用多元线性回归方法来确定泰语写作教师对新主题信息流的识别与合格的母语英语写作教师对主题信息流进行的初步分析之间的关系。从这项研究中获得的见解表明,泰国学术英语写作教师不能显著地检测到学术文本中存在新主题信息的进展。这项研究的含义表明,目前,在泰国学术英语写作教师的书面评估中,实际使用既定的新进展分析可能不是一种可行的评估措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信