Virgil and the Conquest of Chaos

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
N. Horsfall
{"title":"Virgil and the Conquest of Chaos","authors":"N. Horsfall","doi":"10.1017/S0066477400004627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hunt for Virgil’s sources has been, by unspoken agreement among Latinists, largely abandoned. This regrettable development may in part have been a by-product of the justifiable revulsion against the excesses of Quellenforschung as practised c. 1880-c. 1930 (everyone read Posidonius and Varro; no-one else was read), in part by the opening of alluring new vistas in Virgilian studies, where apparent progress might be made without the need of painstaking consultation of HRR,GRF,FGH,FHG and similar collections. It has therefore escaped notice that just as the detailed examination of Virgil’s use of Homer (Knauer, Die Aeneis und Homer) or even of the Homer scholia (Schlunk, Virgil and the Homeric Scholia) can lead to immensely valuable advances in our understanding of the poet’s compositional techniques, so the survey of Virgil’s prose sources and the analysis of how he handles the material available to him can be employed to precisely comparable ends. It is the purpose of this paper to indicate some ways in which such a survey may be put into effect.","PeriodicalId":41516,"journal":{"name":"Antichthon","volume":"15 1","pages":"141 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0066477400004627","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antichthon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066477400004627","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

The hunt for Virgil’s sources has been, by unspoken agreement among Latinists, largely abandoned. This regrettable development may in part have been a by-product of the justifiable revulsion against the excesses of Quellenforschung as practised c. 1880-c. 1930 (everyone read Posidonius and Varro; no-one else was read), in part by the opening of alluring new vistas in Virgilian studies, where apparent progress might be made without the need of painstaking consultation of HRR,GRF,FGH,FHG and similar collections. It has therefore escaped notice that just as the detailed examination of Virgil’s use of Homer (Knauer, Die Aeneis und Homer) or even of the Homer scholia (Schlunk, Virgil and the Homeric Scholia) can lead to immensely valuable advances in our understanding of the poet’s compositional techniques, so the survey of Virgil’s prose sources and the analysis of how he handles the material available to him can be employed to precisely comparable ends. It is the purpose of this paper to indicate some ways in which such a survey may be put into effect.
维吉尔与混沌的征服
寻找维吉尔作品来源的努力,在拉丁主义者之间达成了默契,基本上已经被放弃了。这种令人遗憾的发展,在某种程度上可能是对1880-c年间实行的过分的奎伦福尔松(Quellenforschung)的正当反感的副产品。1930年(每个人都读波西多尼乌斯和瓦罗;没有人读过),部分原因是弗吉尼亚研究开辟了诱人的新前景,在那里,明显的进展可能会取得,而不需要对HRR、GRF、FGH、FHG和类似的收藏进行艰苦的咨询。因此,我们没有注意到,正如详细研究维吉尔对荷马(克瑙尔,《爱涅斯和荷马》)甚至荷马学派(施伦克,维吉尔和荷马学派)的使用可以使我们对诗人的写作技巧的理解取得巨大的有价值的进展一样,对维吉尔散文来源的调查和对他如何处理可用材料的分析可以被用来达到完全相同的目的。本文的目的是指出这种调查可能付诸实施的一些方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antichthon
Antichthon CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信