Book review: The Life and Career of Archbishop Richard Whately: Ireland, Religion and Reform, The Life and Times of Daniel Murray, Archbishop of Dublin 1823–1852

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY
C. McCabe
{"title":"Book review: The Life and Career of Archbishop Richard Whately: Ireland, Religion and Reform, The Life and Times of Daniel Murray, Archbishop of Dublin 1823–1852","authors":"C. McCabe","doi":"10.1177/0332489320969995a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"bishops of Dublin and Armagh respectively was extremely limited indeed. It was not the case in the Pale, as Booker mistakenly states, that most beneficed clergy employed curates (p. 118); rather that the holders of the revenues of impropriated benefices, mostly religious houses, commonly employed stipendiary priests rather than vicars to serve the cure of souls – and this reviewer showed several years ago that the overwhelming majority of the stipendiary parish priests of County Louth in the early sixteenth century were Irish, a number of them from clerical families from Ulster. There was, of course, a very small number of Irish clergy who secured middleranking positions in the administration of the Church in the Pale (such as Cormac Roth of Armagh who, again, was long known to have been Irish), but like their secular counterparts they were exceptional. Hence, the status of Irish priests within the Church in the Pale generally mirrored that accorded to the Irish population in the wider community, and if Church played a positive role in interethnic relations within the Pale, the work of Murray, in particular, suggests that it was nothing as positive as that ascribed to it by Booker. This book concludes with the observation that ‘the region [of the Pale] and its English inhabitants were profoundly influenced by Irish culture and Irish people, who in turn were shaped by their time in the colony’ (p. 249). The Irish were disproportionately represented in the poorer segments of society, but an exceptional minority managed to become wealthy despite a raft of anti-Irish legislation intended to copper-fasten the privileges of the colonial community at the expense of the indigenous population. The irony is that when English identity was redefined on the basis of Protestantism during the Tudor reformations, the old colonial community in Ireland found itself victimised alongside the indigenous community by new anti-Irish legislation framed to copperfasten Protestant privilege at the expense of Catholics.","PeriodicalId":41191,"journal":{"name":"Irish Economic and Social History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0332489320969995a","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Economic and Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0332489320969995a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

bishops of Dublin and Armagh respectively was extremely limited indeed. It was not the case in the Pale, as Booker mistakenly states, that most beneficed clergy employed curates (p. 118); rather that the holders of the revenues of impropriated benefices, mostly religious houses, commonly employed stipendiary priests rather than vicars to serve the cure of souls – and this reviewer showed several years ago that the overwhelming majority of the stipendiary parish priests of County Louth in the early sixteenth century were Irish, a number of them from clerical families from Ulster. There was, of course, a very small number of Irish clergy who secured middleranking positions in the administration of the Church in the Pale (such as Cormac Roth of Armagh who, again, was long known to have been Irish), but like their secular counterparts they were exceptional. Hence, the status of Irish priests within the Church in the Pale generally mirrored that accorded to the Irish population in the wider community, and if Church played a positive role in interethnic relations within the Pale, the work of Murray, in particular, suggests that it was nothing as positive as that ascribed to it by Booker. This book concludes with the observation that ‘the region [of the Pale] and its English inhabitants were profoundly influenced by Irish culture and Irish people, who in turn were shaped by their time in the colony’ (p. 249). The Irish were disproportionately represented in the poorer segments of society, but an exceptional minority managed to become wealthy despite a raft of anti-Irish legislation intended to copper-fasten the privileges of the colonial community at the expense of the indigenous population. The irony is that when English identity was redefined on the basis of Protestantism during the Tudor reformations, the old colonial community in Ireland found itself victimised alongside the indigenous community by new anti-Irish legislation framed to copperfasten Protestant privilege at the expense of Catholics.
书评:Richard Whately大主教的生活和职业生涯:爱尔兰、宗教和改革,都柏林大主教Daniel Murray的生活和时代1823–1852
都柏林和阿马的主教人数确实极为有限。正如布克错误地指出的那样,《苍白》中的情况并非如此,大多数行善的神职人员都雇佣了副牧师(第118页);相反,不适当的慈善机构(主要是宗教机构)的收入持有者通常雇佣有津贴的牧师而不是牧师来为灵魂的治疗服务——这位评论家几年前就表明,16世纪初劳斯郡绝大多数有津贴的教区牧师都是爱尔兰人,其中一些人来自阿尔斯特的牧师家庭。当然,在Pale教会的管理中,有极少数爱尔兰神职人员获得了中级职位(比如Armagh的Cormac Roth,他也是众所周知的爱尔兰人),但与世俗神职人员一样,他们也是例外。因此,爱尔兰牧师在帕莱教会中的地位通常反映了更广泛社区中爱尔兰人的地位,如果教会在帕莱的种族间关系中发挥了积极作用,特别是默里的工作表明,这并不像布克所说的那样积极。这本书的结论是,“(帕莱)地区及其英国居民深受爱尔兰文化和爱尔兰人的影响,而爱尔兰人又受到他们在殖民地的时间的影响”(第249页)。爱尔兰人在社会的贫困阶层中所占比例过高,但尽管一系列反爱尔兰立法旨在以牺牲土著人口为代价来巩固殖民社区的特权,但仍有少数人成功致富。具有讽刺意味的是,当都铎王朝改革时期,英国人的身份在新教的基础上被重新定义时,爱尔兰的旧殖民地社区发现自己与土著社区一起受到了新的反爱尔兰立法的伤害,该立法旨在以牺牲天主教徒为代价来巩固新教特权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信