Xian-tao Li, Yanyan Huang, Ruiquan Chen, Meihong Guo, P. Guo
{"title":"Intraoperative sac coiling embolization in type II endoleak high-risk population after endovascular aortic repair","authors":"Xian-tao Li, Yanyan Huang, Ruiquan Chen, Meihong Guo, P. Guo","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the effectiveness and safety of intraoperative sac coiling embolization among patients who are athigh-risk developing type-Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair(EVAR). \n \n \nMethods \nFrom Jan 2014 to Jan 2018, one hundred and twelve consecutive patients with infra-renal AAA were enrolled for this study, There were 76 patients undergoing standard EVAR (standard-group)and 36 patients doing aneurysmal sac coiling embolization (embo-group). Baseline characteristics, aneurysmal sac parameters, radiological intervention details and follow up results were recorded. \n \n \nResults \nMean follow-up time was 25.9 m for embo-group. During follow-up period, no coils-related complications were noted and no type-Ⅱ endoleak associated secondary interventions were reported. A mean of (2.72±1.16) coils (range 1-7) was used in the embo-group. The incidence of type Ⅱ endoleak was 30.3%(23/76) in standard-group and 11.1%(4/36) in embo-group(χ2=4.90, P=0.027). Logistic multivariate analysis revealed that the independent risk factors of type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair for high-risk patients were those EVAR without sac embolization and sac volume≥128 cm3. In the subgroup analysis (sac volume≥128 cm3), the incidence of type-Ⅱ endoleak was lower in embo-group compared to standard-group (χ2=6.07, P=0.014). \n \n \nConclusion \nIntraoperative sac coiling embolization in high-risk patients is safe and effective in prevention of type Ⅱ endoleak. This preventive effect is more significant with large sac aneurysm compared to small sac aneurysm. \n \n \nKey words: \nAortic aneurysm, abdominal; Radiology, interventional; Endoleak; Risk assessment","PeriodicalId":66425,"journal":{"name":"中华普通外科杂志","volume":"34 1","pages":"745-749"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华普通外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the effectiveness and safety of intraoperative sac coiling embolization among patients who are athigh-risk developing type-Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair(EVAR).
Methods
From Jan 2014 to Jan 2018, one hundred and twelve consecutive patients with infra-renal AAA were enrolled for this study, There were 76 patients undergoing standard EVAR (standard-group)and 36 patients doing aneurysmal sac coiling embolization (embo-group). Baseline characteristics, aneurysmal sac parameters, radiological intervention details and follow up results were recorded.
Results
Mean follow-up time was 25.9 m for embo-group. During follow-up period, no coils-related complications were noted and no type-Ⅱ endoleak associated secondary interventions were reported. A mean of (2.72±1.16) coils (range 1-7) was used in the embo-group. The incidence of type Ⅱ endoleak was 30.3%(23/76) in standard-group and 11.1%(4/36) in embo-group(χ2=4.90, P=0.027). Logistic multivariate analysis revealed that the independent risk factors of type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair for high-risk patients were those EVAR without sac embolization and sac volume≥128 cm3. In the subgroup analysis (sac volume≥128 cm3), the incidence of type-Ⅱ endoleak was lower in embo-group compared to standard-group (χ2=6.07, P=0.014).
Conclusion
Intraoperative sac coiling embolization in high-risk patients is safe and effective in prevention of type Ⅱ endoleak. This preventive effect is more significant with large sac aneurysm compared to small sac aneurysm.
Key words:
Aortic aneurysm, abdominal; Radiology, interventional; Endoleak; Risk assessment