Assessing performance using maturity model: a multiple case study of public health supply chains in Nigeria

IF 3.2 Q2 MANAGEMENT
R. Abdulkadir, D. B. Matellini, I. Jenkinson, Robyn Pyne, T. Nguyen
{"title":"Assessing performance using maturity model: a multiple case study of public health supply chains in Nigeria","authors":"R. Abdulkadir, D. B. Matellini, I. Jenkinson, Robyn Pyne, T. Nguyen","doi":"10.1108/jhlscm-05-2022-0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to determine the factors and dynamic systems behaviour of essential medicine stockout in public health-care supply chains. The authors examine the constraints and effects of mental models on medicine stockout to develop a dynamic theory of medicine availability towards saving patients’ lives.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study uses a mixed-method approach. Starting with a survey method, followed by in-depth interviews with stakeholders within five health-care supply chains to determine the dynamic feedback leading to stockout and conclude by developing a network mental model for medicines availability.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors identified five constraints and developed five case mental models. The authors develop a dynamic theory of medicine availability across cases and identify feedback loops and variables leading to medicine availability.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe need to include mental models of stakeholders like manufacturers and distributors of medicines to understand the system completely. Group surveys are prone to power dynamics and bias from group thinking. This survey’s quantitative output could minimize the bias.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study uniquely uses a mixed-method of survey method and in-depth interviews of experts to assess the essential medicine stockout in Nigeria. To improve medicine availability, the authors develop a dynamic network mental model to understand the system structure, feedback and behaviour driving stockouts. This research will benefit public policymakers and hospital managers in designing policies that reduce medicine stockout.\n","PeriodicalId":46575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jhlscm-05-2022-0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to determine the factors and dynamic systems behaviour of essential medicine stockout in public health-care supply chains. The authors examine the constraints and effects of mental models on medicine stockout to develop a dynamic theory of medicine availability towards saving patients’ lives. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a mixed-method approach. Starting with a survey method, followed by in-depth interviews with stakeholders within five health-care supply chains to determine the dynamic feedback leading to stockout and conclude by developing a network mental model for medicines availability. Findings The authors identified five constraints and developed five case mental models. The authors develop a dynamic theory of medicine availability across cases and identify feedback loops and variables leading to medicine availability. Research limitations/implications The need to include mental models of stakeholders like manufacturers and distributors of medicines to understand the system completely. Group surveys are prone to power dynamics and bias from group thinking. This survey’s quantitative output could minimize the bias. Originality/value This study uniquely uses a mixed-method of survey method and in-depth interviews of experts to assess the essential medicine stockout in Nigeria. To improve medicine availability, the authors develop a dynamic network mental model to understand the system structure, feedback and behaviour driving stockouts. This research will benefit public policymakers and hospital managers in designing policies that reduce medicine stockout.
利用成熟度模型评估绩效:对尼日利亚公共卫生供应链的多案例研究
目的研究公共卫生供应链中基本药物缺货的影响因素和动态系统行为。作者研究了心理模型对药物缺货的限制和影响,以发展一种动态的药物可用性理论,以挽救患者的生命。设计/方法/方法本研究采用混合方法。首先采用调查方法,然后与五个医疗保健供应链内的利益攸关方进行深入访谈,以确定导致缺货的动态反馈,最后通过开发药品可用性的网络心理模型来结束。研究结果作者确定了五个制约因素,并开发了五个案例心理模型。作者开发了一种跨病例的药物可用性动态理论,并确定了导致药物可用性的反馈循环和变量。研究限制/启示需要包括利益相关者的心理模型,如药品制造商和分销商,以完全理解该系统。群体调查容易受到权力动力学和群体思维偏见的影响。这项调查的量化产出可以最大限度地减少偏见。原创性/价值本研究独特地采用了调查法和专家深度访谈的混合方法来评估尼日利亚基本药物缺货情况。为了提高药物的可获得性,作者开发了一个动态网络心理模型来理解导致缺货的系统结构、反馈和行为。这项研究将有利于公共政策制定者和医院管理者设计减少药品短缺的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management (JHLSCM) is targeted at academics and practitioners in humanitarian public and private sector organizations working on all aspects of humanitarian logistics and supply chain management. The journal promotes the exchange of knowledge, experience and new ideas between researchers and practitioners and encourages a multi-disciplinary and cross-functional approach to the resolution of problems and exploitations of opportunities within humanitarian supply chains. Contributions are encouraged from diverse disciplines (logistics, operations management, process engineering, health care, geography, management science, information technology, ethics, corporate social responsibility, disaster management, development aid, public policy) but need to have a logistics and/or supply chain focus. JHLSCM publishes state of the art research, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative approaches, in the field of humanitarian and development aid logistics and supply chain management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信