Biomechanical investigation of optimal bed height for egressing and ingressing hospital beds

IF 1.6
Human factors in healthcare Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.hfh.2023.100053
Ahmad Raza Usmani , Susan E. Kotowski , Jay Kim , Thomas R. Huston , Kermit G. Davis
{"title":"Biomechanical investigation of optimal bed height for egressing and ingressing hospital beds","authors":"Ahmad Raza Usmani ,&nbsp;Susan E. Kotowski ,&nbsp;Jay Kim ,&nbsp;Thomas R. Huston ,&nbsp;Kermit G. Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.hfh.2023.100053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims and objectives</h3><p>To determine what bed heights are optimal for egress and ingress to the bed, based on quantitative measures and subjective perception.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Many patient falls are related to the patient's interaction with the hospital bed. Beds with lower heights were introduced to reduce the impact of injury due to patient falls. However, low-height beds imposed different kinds of issues during ingress/egress without assistance, such as greater forces and increased inertia required to overcome the center of mass being below the knees.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional controlled laboratory study with 24 healthy adults was conducted to assess the biomechanical parameters at different bed heights.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>The bed height ranged from 43 cm to 86 cm, in 2.54 cm increments (completed in random order). Two force plates measured ground reaction force and center of pressure. Perception of stability and difficulty were collected from the subject after each trial. Documentation of hand-support of subject was also recorded for each trial. A two-factor Analysis of Variance was conducted to determine the significance between ingress/egress and bed height with post hoc Tukey test to determine source for significance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Bed Height emerged as a significant factor in determining the ability to ingress/egress from a hospital bed. The results indicated that for medium bed heights (51–66 cm), ingress/egress were less difficult (1–2, on a scale of 10), more stable (approximately 9/10), and had less vertical ground reaction forces (&lt;1000 N).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The ingress/egress was found to be best executed at medium heights (51–66 cm) as participants performed better biomechanically and were more stable than lower or higher heights.</p></div><div><h3>Relevance to clinical practice</h3><p>The results conclude that hospitals should endorse policies to keep the bed heights between 51 and 66 cm for ingress and egress.</p></div><div><h3>Patient or public contribution</h3><p>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93564,"journal":{"name":"Human factors in healthcare","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100053"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human factors in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772501423000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and objectives

To determine what bed heights are optimal for egress and ingress to the bed, based on quantitative measures and subjective perception.

Background

Many patient falls are related to the patient's interaction with the hospital bed. Beds with lower heights were introduced to reduce the impact of injury due to patient falls. However, low-height beds imposed different kinds of issues during ingress/egress without assistance, such as greater forces and increased inertia required to overcome the center of mass being below the knees.

Design

A cross-sectional controlled laboratory study with 24 healthy adults was conducted to assess the biomechanical parameters at different bed heights.

Methodology

The bed height ranged from 43 cm to 86 cm, in 2.54 cm increments (completed in random order). Two force plates measured ground reaction force and center of pressure. Perception of stability and difficulty were collected from the subject after each trial. Documentation of hand-support of subject was also recorded for each trial. A two-factor Analysis of Variance was conducted to determine the significance between ingress/egress and bed height with post hoc Tukey test to determine source for significance.

Results

Bed Height emerged as a significant factor in determining the ability to ingress/egress from a hospital bed. The results indicated that for medium bed heights (51–66 cm), ingress/egress were less difficult (1–2, on a scale of 10), more stable (approximately 9/10), and had less vertical ground reaction forces (<1000 N).

Conclusion

The ingress/egress was found to be best executed at medium heights (51–66 cm) as participants performed better biomechanically and were more stable than lower or higher heights.

Relevance to clinical practice

The results conclude that hospitals should endorse policies to keep the bed heights between 51 and 66 cm for ingress and egress.

Patient or public contribution

No Patient or Public Contribution.

进出医院病床最佳床高的生物力学研究
目的和目标根据定量测量和主观感知,确定进出床的最佳床高。背景:许多患者跌倒与患者与医院病床的相互作用有关。引入了较低高度的床,以减少因患者跌倒而造成的伤害。然而,在没有辅助的情况下,低高度的床在进出时带来了各种各样的问题,比如更大的力和增加的惯性,以克服膝盖以下的重心。设计对24名健康成人进行了横断面对照实验室研究,以评估不同床高下的生物力学参数。方法床高43 ~ 86 cm,以2.54 cm为单位(随机完成)。两块测力板分别测量地面反作用力和压力中心。每次试验后收集受试者对稳定性和难度的感知。每次试验还记录受试者的手支持文件。采用双因素方差分析确定入/出与床高之间的显著性,采用事后Tukey检验确定显著性来源。结果床高是决定患者进出医院病床能力的重要因素。结果表明,中等床高(51-66 cm)的入/出床难度较低(1-2,10分),稳定性较好(约9/10),垂直地面反作用力较小(<1000 N)。结论中等床高(51-66 cm)的入/出床比低床高或高床高的入/出床的生物力学性能更好,稳定性更强。结果表明,医院应制定政策,将进出床高度保持在51 ~ 66 cm之间。病人或公众捐款:没有病人或公众捐款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human factors in healthcare
Human factors in healthcare Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
145 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书