The Authority Enhancement of The Election Supervisory Agency Post The Enforcement of Law Number 7 of 2017 Regarding General Election

Dwi Zaen Prasetyo
{"title":"The Authority Enhancement of The Election Supervisory Agency Post The Enforcement of Law Number 7 of 2017 Regarding General Election","authors":"Dwi Zaen Prasetyo","doi":"10.25041/constitutionale.v3i2.2745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of elections in Indonesia has its own characteristics, where the regulation of the implementation of these simultaneous elections is set to be one in Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Elections. In addition, this Act also gives the Electoral Observer quasi-judicial authority in the process of dealing with administrative and arbitrary violations of the Electoral Process, with sanctions granted through an Electoral Observer Decision. It attracted the authors to do research on the electoral supervisory authorities that are experiencing enlargement and loading and to see the implications of quasi-judicial authority granted through several case analyses. This study aims to analyze the issues of (a) the form of authority enhancement given to Bawaslu, and (b) the implementation of Bawaslu's authority in its effort of handling election violation and resolving election disputes in Lampung Province according to Law No. 7 Year 2017 regarding the General Election. The methods used in this research is a normative-empirical law study. Data sources of this research are primary, secondary and tertiary law objects using qualitative analysis method. The result obtained from this research shows enhancement of election supervisor's authority in the areas of: First, handling process of election criminal violation; Second, the handling of election organizers' ethical code violation; Third, the handling of election administration violation; Fourth, election process dispute resolution. The enhancement of Bawaslu's authority that became a characteristic is that it is given quasi judicial in handling administrative violation and election process dispute that can be seen in 4 (four) election regimes.","PeriodicalId":52591,"journal":{"name":"Constitutionale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutionale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v3i2.2745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of elections in Indonesia has its own characteristics, where the regulation of the implementation of these simultaneous elections is set to be one in Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Elections. In addition, this Act also gives the Electoral Observer quasi-judicial authority in the process of dealing with administrative and arbitrary violations of the Electoral Process, with sanctions granted through an Electoral Observer Decision. It attracted the authors to do research on the electoral supervisory authorities that are experiencing enlargement and loading and to see the implications of quasi-judicial authority granted through several case analyses. This study aims to analyze the issues of (a) the form of authority enhancement given to Bawaslu, and (b) the implementation of Bawaslu's authority in its effort of handling election violation and resolving election disputes in Lampung Province according to Law No. 7 Year 2017 regarding the General Election. The methods used in this research is a normative-empirical law study. Data sources of this research are primary, secondary and tertiary law objects using qualitative analysis method. The result obtained from this research shows enhancement of election supervisor's authority in the areas of: First, handling process of election criminal violation; Second, the handling of election organizers' ethical code violation; Third, the handling of election administration violation; Fourth, election process dispute resolution. The enhancement of Bawaslu's authority that became a characteristic is that it is given quasi judicial in handling administrative violation and election process dispute that can be seen in 4 (four) election regimes.
选举监督机构职位的权力增强2017年关于大选的第7号法律的实施
印度尼西亚选举的实施有其自身的特点,2017年关于大选的第7号法律规定了同时进行选举的规定。此外,该法还赋予选举观察员处理行政和任意违反选举程序行为的准司法权力,并通过选举观察员决定给予制裁。它吸引了作者对正在经历扩大和加载的选举监督机构进行研究,并通过几个案例分析来了解准司法权力的含义。本研究旨在分析以下问题:(a)赋予巴瓦斯卢权力的形式,以及(b)根据2017年第7号大选法,巴瓦斯鲁在处理楠榜省选举违规和解决选举争议方面的权力执行情况。本研究所采用的方法是规范性的实证法学研究。本研究的数据来源为一级、二级和三级法律对象,采用定性分析方法。研究结果表明,选举监督员的职权在以下几个方面得到了增强:一是选举违法行为的处理过程;二是对选举组织者违反道德规范行为的处理;三是对违反选举管理行为的处理;第四,选举过程中争议的解决。巴瓦斯卢权威的增强成为一个特点,即它在处理行政违规和选举过程争议方面被赋予了准司法性,这在四(4)个选举制度中都可以看到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信