Comparison of Mosquito Larvicidal Formulations of Diflubenzuron on Culex Pipiens Mosquitoes in Belgrade, Serbia

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Branislav Pešić, Z. Kulišić, R. Teodorović, S. Trailović, V. Djokic, M. Djordjevic
{"title":"Comparison of Mosquito Larvicidal Formulations of Diflubenzuron on Culex Pipiens Mosquitoes in Belgrade, Serbia","authors":"Branislav Pešić, Z. Kulišić, R. Teodorović, S. Trailović, V. Djokic, M. Djordjevic","doi":"10.2478/acve-2022-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Culex mosquitos are important infectious diseases vectors in temperate and tropical regions of the World, affecting nearly 350 million people in both developed and developing countries. Our approach was to “recycle” the well-established larvicide, and by studying the tablets, pellets and granules as floating or sinking formulations, we found a method to optimise the use of diflubenzuron against Culex pipiens mosquitoes in field conditions. A standard WHO procedure was used to test the larvicide efficacy. The combined efficacy of all floating formulations was 10.7% higher than sinking preparations (p-value =0.002) and that maximised throughout the experiment on days 14 and 21, (p-values 0.012 and 0.008, respectively). All floating formulations kept their efficacies above 70% until day 21 of the experiment, while the mortality of sinking designs dropped significantly after day 14. The lowest efficacy was observed when sinking granules were used and the highest when floating tablets were applied in the canals. Only the floating tablets showed no significant changes in efficacy from day 1 to 21, but then that efficacy drops sharp until day 35. Since the larvae spend most of their time on the surface of the slow-moving waters to breathe, and floating pellets and tablets are made of materials that can serve as food sources, we conclude that these formulations have a higher efficacy, at least in conditions of non- or slow-moving waters. This study shows the importance of a systematic approach to reformulation of old, already proven and environmentally safe larvicides which can control the mosquito populations and their spreading of various pathogens.","PeriodicalId":55559,"journal":{"name":"Acta Veterinaria-Beograd","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Veterinaria-Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2022-0007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Culex mosquitos are important infectious diseases vectors in temperate and tropical regions of the World, affecting nearly 350 million people in both developed and developing countries. Our approach was to “recycle” the well-established larvicide, and by studying the tablets, pellets and granules as floating or sinking formulations, we found a method to optimise the use of diflubenzuron against Culex pipiens mosquitoes in field conditions. A standard WHO procedure was used to test the larvicide efficacy. The combined efficacy of all floating formulations was 10.7% higher than sinking preparations (p-value =0.002) and that maximised throughout the experiment on days 14 and 21, (p-values 0.012 and 0.008, respectively). All floating formulations kept their efficacies above 70% until day 21 of the experiment, while the mortality of sinking designs dropped significantly after day 14. The lowest efficacy was observed when sinking granules were used and the highest when floating tablets were applied in the canals. Only the floating tablets showed no significant changes in efficacy from day 1 to 21, but then that efficacy drops sharp until day 35. Since the larvae spend most of their time on the surface of the slow-moving waters to breathe, and floating pellets and tablets are made of materials that can serve as food sources, we conclude that these formulations have a higher efficacy, at least in conditions of non- or slow-moving waters. This study shows the importance of a systematic approach to reformulation of old, already proven and environmentally safe larvicides which can control the mosquito populations and their spreading of various pathogens.
灭蚊脲对贝尔格莱德地区淡库蚊的杀蚊配方比较
摘要库蚊是世界温带和热带地区的重要传染病媒介,影响着发达国家和发展中国家近3.5亿人。我们的方法是“回收”公认的杀幼虫剂,通过研究漂浮或下沉配方的片剂、颗粒和颗粒,我们找到了一种在野外条件下优化使用苯脲对抗库蚊的方法。采用世界卫生组织标准程序检测杀幼虫效果。所有漂浮制剂的综合疗效比下沉制剂高10.7%(p值=0.002),并且在第14天和第21天的整个实验中最大化(p值分别为0.012和0.008)。在实验的第21天之前,所有漂浮制剂的疗效都保持在70%以上,而下沉设计的死亡率在第14天之后显著下降。当使用下沉颗粒时观察到最低的疗效,而当在管中应用漂浮片时观察到最高的疗效。从第1天到第21天,只有漂浮片的疗效没有显著变化,但随后疗效急剧下降,直到第35天。由于幼虫大部分时间都在缓慢移动的水面上呼吸,而漂浮的颗粒和药片是由可以作为食物来源的材料制成的,我们得出结论,这些配方具有更高的功效,至少在非缓慢移动的水域条件下是如此。这项研究表明,采用系统的方法重新配制已经证明对环境安全的老式杀幼虫剂的重要性,这种方法可以控制蚊子的数量及其各种病原体的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Veterinaria-Beograd
Acta Veterinaria-Beograd 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
33
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Acta Veterinaria is an open access, peer-reviewed scientific journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia, dedicated to the publication of original research articles, invited review articles, and to limited extent methodology articles and case reports. The journal considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信